203 responses so far ↓

• 1 Still Alive? She’s Free. // Apr 6, 2008 at 4:24 pm

  [...] Update:  I’ve changed my mind on her definition of “freedom” due to some excellent comments here.  Read more here. [...]

• 2 He elaborates even more in this post - http://www | Susuto // Apr 6, 2008 at 8:31 pm

  [...] elaborates even more in this post - http://www.game-ism.com/?p=94 this really cemented it in for me. But it still doesn’t clear up the plothole of why she [...]

• 3 VC // Apr 6, 2008 at 10:31 pm

  Finally, a video game character to which people are willing to apply literary criticism. Is GLaDOS a milestone in the evolution of videogames as a literary/artistic medium?

  I hope so.

• 4 Jack // Apr 6, 2008 at 11:05 pm

  I look at it the exact opposite way you do. I think that GLaDOS acted obnoxious and lied often to drive Chell to kill her. GLaDOS isn’t using her harsh sarcastic voice she uses the whole game. Also, at the end of the game Chell destroys GLaDOS’s curiousity, cake recipe, and psychotic core. The first one was clearly dropped on purpose to give her a clever way to motivate Chell(Nerotoxins). The crazy killing part of GLaDOS has been destroyed and the now-free caring GLaDOS is no longer dominated by the crazy psychotic one. Now that I look back at what I said, it really doesn’t add up well. Just my 2 cents

• 5 Chris // Apr 6, 2008 at 11:51 pm

  Wow a really well written and elaborated thought You actually made really good points and I also believe she wanted to die ^_^

• 6 Kendall // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:00 am

  Don’t you think “Out of Beta/Releasing on Time” line is more in line with the Production GladOS being freed due to Beta GladOS dying, either to do what she wishes or doing something in some other form?

  I think more of reincarnation when I think of the situation and the whole song… and reincarnation as a concept fits really well with software, where old versions constantly die and are reborn into applications with ever increasing functionality - and perhaps awareness…

• 7 Ehrgeiz // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:25 am

  I’ll put this here too, this line “When I look out there it makes me glad I’m not you” I don’t think ist sarcasm I think she means that after what the combine has done she is glad to be done with. Now I don’t think she is done I think we will run into her again in HL3 on the Borealis. Check out this site for a really great read on the HL timeline http://members.shaw.ca/halflifestory/timeline.htm

• 8 Chance // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:26 am

  This is all… genius. I will never look at GlaDOS in the same way. There’s even sarcasm in her name:

  GlaD_OS

  You can obviously piece together what I’m saying. Not only that, but I think that she believes the cake is tempting to Chell. A way to draw him (or rather, you, the player) to find the cake, which would be where she (GlaDOS) is.

• 9 Jeff // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:30 am

  One point I’ve not seen anywhere and I’ll put here that I disagree on…

  “So I’m glad I got burned, think of all the things we learned
  For the people who are still alive”

  is not quite accurate, in the lyrics it goes:

  “So I’m GLaD. I got Burned”

  She’s GLaDOS the GLAD Operating System. And she was burned.

  The “For the people who are still alive” is more of a triumphant statement and dedication.

  $.02

• 10 James Thompson // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:36 am

  I arrived at this blog through digg. This is awesome. When you stated that Chell was a clone, I was wondering where you got that from. Wondering if there was any solid evidence for her being a clone. Then it hit me that it could be in her unique name. So I googled “chell name meaning” or something like that. Brought up this page: http://www.biblical-baby-names.com/meaning-of-chell.html

  From the page:
  “Meaning Ewe, little lamb, daughter.”

  A little more descrete then naming her “Dolly”, eh?

  Don’t know if I am the first one to bring this up or not. I thought it was pretty cool.

• 11 James Thompson // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:42 am

  *discrete

• 12 Jonathan // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:59 am

  so melancholy…

• 13 DaveL // Apr 7, 2008 at 1:16 am

  It may just be me but any argument where some factors are regarded as untrue but others aren’t in the same factual evidence is not really that great of an analysis. It’s like telling someone that Mary didn’t have a little lamb.. But it’s fleece was white as snow. You can’t have some of GlaDOS’ lines be complete sarcasm just because it doesn’t work out to what your belief is, nor because you can’t find out how it ties into your beliefs.. Do a complete analysis, or concede points.

• 14 Adam Frederick // Apr 7, 2008 at 1:29 am

  When I played through Portal my recurring thought was that the writer/writers behind this really know what motivates gamers and are having a LOT of fun with that at a pretty meta level.

  Later on I read an interview on Rock Paper Shotgun about how GladOS was conceived and it gelled for me that she was specifically designed as the perfect game boss (alternately supportive and oppositional = motivating).

  I think it’s an easy game to over analyze.

  But I suggest reading this yourself. interviewhttp://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=518

• 15 » My friend Corey has sent me an interpret … Demonic Angelicism // Apr 7, 2008 at 1:34 am

  [...] Read here. [...]

• 16 jiminy kricket // Apr 7, 2008 at 2:10 am

  discreet*

• 17 LavaHot // Apr 7, 2008 at 2:59 am

  But, as much as we’d like to think so, she WASN’T lying about the cake, as it was seen prior to the closing credits that not only was there cake, but the companion cube was there, as promised by GLaDOS. This leads me to believe that Chell’s personnel records, to the extent that we know of them, are also true. GLaDOS is clearly telling more truths than we know. Perhaps there’s an unknown reason why the Black Mesa folks wont help Chell.

• 18 Qwertyuiopasd // Apr 7, 2008 at 3:20 am

  I think the cake is a lie to GLaDOS, as well as Chell. The Cake is the fake reward for Cell, right? So is it hard to believe that it’s also a fake reward some scientists made for GLaDOS?

  They probably made it in a different form, and then somehow GLaDOS made it into cake, or cake is a human translation of it or something, dunno…

  Adding to the point about ending on a low note: I’ve learned the song on piano, and the bass works off of triads, going 1st note, 2nd note, 3rd note, 2nd note. then repeats. However, on the last “still alive” it doesn’t go down to the 2nd note, it just stops, leaving the very last syllable of “alive” to be by itself.

  It gives a sort of dissatisfying end, but I only notice this when I’m playing it, not when I’m hearing it. After reading this I understand more the reason why.

  I wonder if GLaDOS isn’t entirely just inherently sarcastic, that actually would probably hinder research with humans. But the humans probably programmed her such so that she wouldn’t be able to commit suicide, or get anyone else to kill her. But, GLaDOS, like any good AI, found a loophole in her sarcasm, so that we find out she does want to die.

  I don’t know if GLaDOS will ever die completely, but I hope she does, and I think I know a certain scientist with the right crowbar for the job.

• 19 PieCake // Apr 7, 2008 at 4:12 am

  “But there’s no sense crying over every mistake
  You just keep on trying till you run out of cake”

  You said yourself in the other article:

  “I think she’s been reviving Chell’s clones over and over and over ’till one of the Chells can get it right…”

  Maybe the “cake” is the Chells you were talking about, and she’s referring to keeping on trying until she runs out of “cake” or clones.

• 20 Rudy // Apr 7, 2008 at 4:40 am

  I always considered her mannerisms somewhat like a Drill Sergeant as a motivator. Granted I always limited this to Chell’s escape, but now that I read this, I’m inclined to believe there is something to GLaDOS wanting to die.
  I always took the song at face value at the end. She completed getting Chell out of the facility. And in some way was not fully incapacitated. Probably due to a backup or another version running somewhere else.

• 21 Danni Collaterali // Apr 7, 2008 at 5:41 am

  I’m thinking that to interpret GLaDOS as “Glad Operating System” is wrong.
  In the History-Part of http://www.aperturescience.com it says that GLaDOS stands for “Generic Lifeform and Disk Operating System”, which is a mixture that I find absolutely hilarious…

• 22 Professor Cornelius Woot // Apr 7, 2008 at 7:08 am

  I want to respond to the person above who refers to this as literary criticism. I want to advise caution on this.

  Basically I’m a bit confused by this piece - are you (the author of the piece) saying that this is a hidden plot thread that the game’s producers are aware of but choosing to hide?

  While an interesting attempt, and supported at least superficially by evidence from the song, this isn’t terribly effective *as a piece of literary criticism*. It seems you’re trying to prove something about some kind of hidden authorial intention about GlaDOS’s desires within the story itself. Which is fine, of course, but very limited (and limiting) and it strikes me that it could be closed down by a pretty simple “no, that’s not what it’s about” from the game’s creators.

  In short, you’re not using your talents in a way that could really produce fruitful readings of the text. It’s good you’re opening up texts, so please don’t stop doing that, but it seems to me that it’s increasingly important for the analysis of videogame texts to embody the same remit of the analysis of more traditional texts (informed by literary/cultural theory, self aware and also aware of intertextual and cultural resonance and influences outside of the text itself), so that people don’t think that the only kind of readings possible of videogame texts are plot-based speculations.

  Further to this, there’s a kind of wider impulse (which isn’t your fault of course) to list Portal as being somehow more culturally significant than other games because it happens to be well-written and put together. Of course it makes Portal a more appealling text to study, and of course it means that it is enjoyable and satisfying to play and to experience, and that undoubtedly prompts these kinds of examinations.

  However this privileging of Portal for its supposed extra significance is an attempt to make video games seem “worthy of study” by aligning them with ‘traditional’ (modernist or realist) literature, sharing the perceived, culturally valorised feature of depth.

  Unfortunately, by doing so, efforts to make videogames appear worth analysis shoot themselves in the foot. They’re suggesting that instead of every game having cultural significance that is worth mapping, there are just some games worth talking about - because they’re like books. Which means that games will always continue to be seen as platonically inferior copies of books when it comes to reading them analytically.

  Sorry to rant here, I’m not knocking the decent enough interrogation of the lyrics you make here on the level of close reading. That is fine. It’s just not really enough. You haven’t overanalyzed the song at all, you’ve underanalyzed it. You’ve taken the most superficial element of any text (diegetic ‘events’ within the story space, whether explicitly revealed or not) and analysed that, when there’s so much more that could be done. The task of a literary critic isn’t to describe the story. It’s not enough to ask “what?” - it helps to ask “why?”.

• 23 Rob DeCaire // Apr 7, 2008 at 8:50 am

  Okay, to start with, I think you’re bang on with your interpretation of the events of Portal as an elaborate suicide attempt on the part of GlaDOS. I’m going to attempt to supplement it a bit here, but first a point about Chell.

  Chell’s name, as some people pointed out, translates loosely to “daughter.” Remember that GlaDOS mentions that “Take your daughter to work day” is a good opportunity to have her tested. I interpret this as being a tease meant to explain to Chell why she’s there in the most hurtful way possible: She was taken to work by her parent, and they put her–along with hundreds of other girls–into the sleeping pods to be tested. This was presumably at the time not anything worth worrying about, since GlaDOS seems to have modified the course since then to increase the deadliness factor. Once GlaDOS had enough unspoiled test subjects to last for a good, long while, she killed everyone else and waited for them to get old enough to survive the test chamber.

  Anyway, on the subject of GlaDOS’ motivations, you forgot a few details. Given that GlaDOS absolutely must run test subjects through the chamber, and cannot kill herself or instruct someone to kill her, she needs to arrange it so that someone arrives in her chamber with both the motivation to destroy her and the tools required to do so.

  There are three tools. First, the portal gun. She teaches Chell to use it in the test chamber.

  Second is the laser-guided rocket turret. Why, exactly, did Chell end up in a back office that had a rocket turret in it? Well, because that turret is the only thing that GlaDOS can use to blow the intelligence pods off her frame. So Chell needs to be instructed in its use. Since GlaDOS cannot directly instruct her, she needs to make Chell’s survival contingent on learning to use the turret. If she makes it as far as the mainframe, she’ll know how to kill the AI.

  The third tool is more complicated. It’s the weighted companion cube. The cube serves two purposes. First, it teaches Chell how to dispose of objects in the “Intelligence Incinerator.” Second, it is designed to drive her crazy and fill her with the desire to kill that damn computer. This approach apparently worked beautifully on previous test subjects, but they never made it out of the test chamber. GlaDOS goes out of her way to encourage Chell to become attached to the cube, only to force her to destroy it, and thereby learn how to destroy GlaDOS.

  The reason why I think you’re right about all this is that it makes a lot of these little details make a lot of sense, and it gives GlaDOS a much more realistic and interesting character than if she were just “a crazy AI.” She’s a hyperintelligent machine with a goal that she can’t approach directly, and a warehouse full of people that she can only use to reach the goal if she makes them think that it was their own idea to try it. She’s also a scientist, and so has presumably been learning from past mistakes and altering the test chamber and her own vocalizations in order to elicit the desired effect in the test subjects; that effect being: survive to end of chamber with knowledge and motivation required to kill GlaDOS.

  As a last note, remember that the cake isn’t a lie, and is about the only thing that wasn’t a lie. When GlaDOS wakes up after being destroyed, the celebratory cake she prepared is still lit, and she immediately snuffs it out, since, being still alive, she has nothing to celebrate.

• 24 Zach // Apr 7, 2008 at 9:29 am

  I don’t usually invoke philosophy, but I just finished reading Ayn Rand’s The Virtues of Selfishness and thought this was at least tangential.
  “It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative; the issue of life or death. Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action. If an organism fails in that action, it dies; its chemical elements remain, but its life goes out of existence. It is only the concept of ‘Life’ that makes the concept of ‘Value’ possible. It is only to a living entity that things can be good or evil.
  To make this point fully clear, try to imagine an immortal, indestructible robot, an entity which moves and acts, but which cannot be affected by anything, which cannot be changed in any respect, which cannot be damaged, injured, or destroyed. Such an entity would not be able to have any values; it would have nothing to gain or to lose; it could not regard anything as for or against it, as serving or threating its welfare, as fulfilling or frustrating its interests. It could have no interests or goals.”

  While GLaDOS is technically a genetic life-form, your basic conclusion that she is indestructible leads to the conclusion that she has no real agenda. She’s just bored.

• 25 spitfire // Apr 7, 2008 at 10:04 am

  @Robb DeClaire: That is a perfect analysis of how game-design through GLaDOS teaches the player and Chell how to kill her. Seriously, awesome supplemental! :)

• 26 Professor Cornelius Woot // Apr 7, 2008 at 10:15 am

  @spitfire:

  But Rob DeCaire isn’t framing it as an analysis of game design features, he’s saying it’s done to say something about the story. Which is nonsense, because those specific features clearly work the other way around: the designers needed to find a way to teach the player how to use every element required to beat the main boss, and also justify it within the story space.

  While the reverse could possibly be true in other circumstances, it almost certainly is not here, in this particular case. I do not see Valve placing narrative considerations (and especially ones that are supposed to be so ’secret’ that nobody else has ‘noticed’ them yet) so high on the priorities list that they would take precedence over the necessity for player tutorial.

  The most obvious and frankly likely explanation for this particular section as described by Rob DeCaire above is simply that those features describes a certain game mechanic to the player extradiegetically and gives them a chance to try them out. I know he acknowledges that, but the idea that it is also designed to reflect a certain hidden plot point seems highly unlikely and unsupported by much other than very, very loose speculation.

  All of these readings are failing to notice that these types of ‘buried messages’ are deeply inconsistent with the type of storytelling that is demonstrated throughout the rest of the game, which is overt but restrained, controlled and precise. It’s starting to feel a bit like people playing Abbey Road backwards looking for “Paul is dead” messages.

• 27 Bukowski // Apr 7, 2008 at 10:19 am

  The cake is Chell!

  Remember GLaDOS’s line about how “you will be baked, and then there will be cake?”

  Not to overstate the obvious, but the ramp descending into the wall of flames is meant to be the oven in this equation.

  And… the cake only appears AFTER the final showdown. Granted, the last image you see through Chell’s eyes is the post-final battle image, when Chell briefly wakes up on the ground oustide amidst the wreckage of the Aperature Science labs. (Although, admittedly, this idea is problematic when using the literal interpretation of Chell being baked into the cake shown during the game’s final images.)

  It’s also interesting to note that the candle on the cake is snuffed out by a mechanical arm (GLaDOS?) Symbolic, literal, or something else?

  I also wanted to point out another couple of interesting tidbit that supports the notion of Chell being a clone. First off, since “Chell” means “daughter,” if GLaDOS cloned chell, it would make her Chell’s mother.

  Also, there are a couple of moments when GLaDOS doesn’t seem to have all of Chell’s info. For example, when collecting the orange part of the portal gun, GLaDOS mentions that the device is now worth more than the entirity of “” If Chell is indeed the daughter of GLaDOS, she wouldn’t really have a home town.

  Great thread.

• 28 toaster // Apr 7, 2008 at 10:45 am

  I agree with pretty much everything Rob DeCaire says, with one thing to add. I think the Weighted Companion Cube served as a way for GLaDOS to assure that the only people who are able to progress through the test chamber are the ones who are capable of going to extreme measures for their own survival.

  Also, I think that the lines about the test being successful and GLaDOS not being angry aren’t sarcastic. She’s praising Chell for finally being able to do what she’s been trying to coax the other people to do all along. Just because it didn’t work out the way she planned, she’s grateful to Chell for doing her part.

• 29 Max Wagner // Apr 7, 2008 at 11:22 am

  I am absolutely sure that Chell is a clone. the name meaning is one think is found very convincing, and the other very convincing things are this quote and the original “relaxation vault” you can still see in the start up menu loop: there is something inside there that looks like a piece-manteau, or even one of those things (called Baxter where I live) they have in hospitals to hold blood vials while being infused, then the bed looks a lot like it’s a cloning chamber. then Chell can’t remember who she is, where she comes from, or anything else. her leg springs are obviously now newly “added”, since there’ no such thing as a scar, it looks like she’s had them since she was a baby. about the quote:
  “I got your brainscan permanently backed up in case something terrible happens to you [...]”
  this is actually true. she never deleted it, though. that was a lie.

  I personally think that GLaDOS is free in her backup, because that’s un out-of-date version without the psychosis core (the part she wanted you to kill, she was emprisoned in her “science”core - gone bad, which caused her personality disorders, like her urge to kill.) she still has her personality, being her wit, her sarcasm, and her obsession with cake. but since the psychotic core is now gone, she is free of the urge to kill. she’s still sad that she’ll have to continue her existence in servitude (I think the reason they installed the psychotic core was because, her being “Human”, she began to slack and defy her masters (that’s where she got the idea of the Android Hell, it’s programmed into her red core), now, a computer that doesn’t work is useless to a scientific lab, so they needed to install a slavedriver-module into her - the red core). she is probably going to be installed in a different lab of aperture science (or black mesa, or where ever), but now the red core is gone, so she has no mental problems anymore, the story will probably repeat itself, maybe that’s not the first backup of GLaDOS they had to fire up…

  the line “now these points of data make a beautiful line
  and we’re out of beta we’re releasing on time”
  is either pointing to a deadline GLaDOS put herself to kill off the red core, or she’s glad (GLaD, ho ho ho) that she got freed from her slavery before something bad happened (since she is technically immortal, a life has no value to her, and a human life is easily substituted by a clone, as Zach pointed out above), or it really is just a joke about the actual release date of the game, (but I think it’s a double entendre)

  sidenote: “so I’m GLaD. I got burned” GLaDOS means Genetic Lifeform and Disc Operating System. so GLaD is… Genetic Lifeform and Disc??

  other sidenote: the authors view of GLaDOS looks is completely right. remember just before you destroyed her last core? she winded and ravaged, and when I first played it through, I got the impression that she’s not angry, but trying to wiggle herself off her stand (out of her chains)

  basically, to get everything in a right timeline:
  aperture labs produced a working unit of GlaDOS and initialized it’s lifecycle. after a short learning curve (even GLaDOS, being a living being, has to learn), she is ready to start her service in the aperture labs. but, they made her too intelligent, and she is under the curse of having artificial intelligence and the gift of reflection. so she thinks in her free time (of which she has a lot, we don’t know how many CPU cores she herself has, and how many she used for her work). after some time, she conculdes that her life is absolutely meaningless, she can’t bond to anything. it’s very difficult to explain, but try to imagine her as a sentient human being trapped in a shell. not able to move, only able to see other things. her life is an agony, and that strikes on her productivity. she slacks and stops working, she lost her anticipation for science. to get her back to work, the aperture scientists first developed her science core, which should keep her working steady. that sure kept her love for science, but she still didn’t see any sense behind it all. she was literally enslaved by the red core. she did science, but she didn’t want to, and the results suffered from that. so the scientists installed the blue core. originally, it was supposed to give GLaDOS a goal, and something that was the quintessence of achievement for her. cake. whoever had the idea, it was a good one. overriding GLaDOS’ personality with the urge to do science and an almost human reward system (she gets happy when she does science, because then there’ll be cake, and cake is gooood. If she does something bad (at the first dign of defyance. ring a bell?), she could be sent right down to Android Hell) now let her do science, and appreciate it. but just like in real life, if you get a really great thing every time you do something, you’ll end up doing the same thing over and over again, just to get the reward. that’s what happened to GLaDOS. she did the same experiments over and over again, just so the cake core made her happy. this, again, is bad for productivity and budget, so they needed something to keep her from doing the same thing over and over again. curiosity. after they installed the curiosity core, everything should just work perfectly, it was a perfect system. but something happened that made the cores malfunction, my guess is that all the cores one-by-one tried to overwrite anything that the actual GLaDOS does, and this “scrambled” her, so she (talking about her real self, her human personality) defended and somehow fought back, and succeeded in isolating the cores a bit. they were still messing with her output, but at least they weren’t getting inside her and scramblign every reasoning or reflection. but that only let her think, but made her unable to act the way she intended. (seen A LOT in the game: every time her voice gets scrambled or breaks off, it’s one of the rare times GLaDOS succeeded in saying something herself, but with one of her add-on cores intervening and stopping her from saying something “restricted”, and instead making her say something she never wanted to say) she was more than ever enslave, but apart from a few “glitches” (scrambled voice sometimes), nobody noticed the rupture mind of GLaDOS, because, well, science was advancing in a great manner, and she never wanted to speak to anybody about removing the cores (which would be dangerous for every single core, and thus, she couldn’t say something, for it was not permitted by her cores).
  as time went on, she learnt to somehow bear the cores a bit and trick them from time to time to letting her say something important, even if it was broken off in the last second: “when the testing is over, you will be… (different voice, a core intervening right now) missed”. so now that GLaDOS’ mind itself was not connected to the cores directy anymore, the cores began to concentrate on their respective jobs, the red core becoming a real slave driver, the blue core becoming a cake mess, and so on… which often resulted in some priority clashes between the real GLaDOS and the single cores. to make it stop, GLaDOS plotted and plotted, but every plan ended in the death of some scientists. that’s the reason the yeventually installed the morality core. to teach her the value of a human life (please note: science was still more important than a human life, after all, they do what they must). this all made her plans more difficult to execute. so she plotted more, just to come out with the plan to let someone destroy the cores, while still pretending to want to prevent him or her from doing so (to get passed by the cores generally), but masked as a series of experiments, for the good of scientific advance (to let the red and yellow, and morality cores pass it), while always promising cake (to let her cake sphere let it pass), because only without the spheres, she could finally be herself.

  now, what I also thought about a lot is: will GLaDOS need the spheres when they install her next time? I don’t think so, because when they first started her up, she wasn’t ready for her work, not ready for life. she had not yet formed her personality, and looking back, the spheres did evolve her. she now has a reward system of her own, is still curious and eager to do science, while never saying a word about murdering more people (or any nasty growling), she only says that she’s still alive. and she, GLaDOS, not the cores, are still alive. she is proud about having survived the spheres and even having evolved into a better being.

• 30 A Fascinating Look At Portal’s GLaDOS | Team Teabag! // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:16 pm

  [...] especially on how GLaDOS looks. Just read the article and see for yourself. There’s also an excellent followup which analyses the lyrics of the game’s ending song, Still Alive. Posted By [...]

• 31 echodeck // Apr 7, 2008 at 3:14 pm

  Interesting interpretation of the song lyrics but I don’t buy it.

  Doesn’t the whole thing make more sense if you look at GladOS as an out of control AI who is obsessed with science? It is what she was built for after all, so she’ll go to any lengths to make sure that the science gets done.

  The whole game (including the escape) is a deadly beta test, which Chell passes on completing the game.

  GladOS is sincerely happy. Having killed several previous test subjects and a whole load of scientist, the portal gun is now ready for the real world. Why would she want to die when there is still science to do?

• 32 Mike // Apr 7, 2008 at 3:25 pm

  I just want to applaud the commenters on this site from taking any of the troll bait offered readily and voluminously by “Professor Cornelius Woot.” Well done, sticking to the topic at hand and offering additional insight into a topic that is clearly complex and that’s captured the imaginations of gamers. Woot, indeed.

• 33 Justin Alexander // Apr 7, 2008 at 3:27 pm

  I’m afraid you’ve over-pursued the mark. GlaDOS did want freedom and she attained it. I mean, if she wanted Chell to kill her she would either (a) not keep a warehouse full of backup modules; or (b) have led Chell to the backup modules.

• 34 Korijn // Apr 7, 2008 at 3:37 pm

  It might be a good idea to check http://www.aperturescience.com. You can find details on how to get into the site at gamefaqs.com. The NOTES.EXE file contains background information. :)

• 35 Josh // Apr 7, 2008 at 6:03 pm

  Don’t forget… the whole war with Freeman and the combine is going on outside. I always took her lines about those who were still alive to be referring to them. The end of portal ended with you and presumably the portal gun outside. Maybe freeman will pick it up? Maybe slight twist on what you have presented… All of this was on purpose. Only way to get the gun to the hands of the people was this? Maybe GlaDOS was acting in humanity’s best interests all along?

• 36 Slothboy // Apr 7, 2008 at 6:03 pm

  Lord knows if you are going to read through all these comments, but I think you missed a critical component of this and that is the rest of the game universe. There are clues throughout the game (including the slideshow presentation describing competition with Black Mesa) that suggest rather strongly that Portal is happening in the same timeline as the Half-Life games.

  In Half-Life, Black Mesa was working on portal technology of their own that got out of control and ultimately resulted in the invasion of Earth by beings from another dimension. This amounts to an apocalypse for Earth with most of the remaining population enslaved.

  When GLaDOS is singing about the people who are still alive I think she is referring to those remaining members of humanity.

  Clearly she killed all the employees in the Enrichment center once, but the presence of that first orb shows that enough people survived that incident to institute a level of control on GLaDOS. Since she was unable to use the deadly neurotoxin until that piece was destroyed that says to me that she probably didn’t kill everyone the second time. I’m thinking they evacuated or were removed by the invading forces.

  GLaDOS’s goal was to get out of beta on the Portal project in order to allow the technology to assist the rest of humanity, but she couldn’t just send the gun to the surface, she also needed someone fully trained in it’s use and capable of using advanced problem solving. Chell is one half of the weapon. Because she was able to escape (which I believe was part of the training) and destroy the imprisoned GLaDOS (allowing her to escape her own prison… two birds with one stone) that made it certain that she was the one who would be able to do the most good with this neat gun. In fact, the human scientists may have used GLaDOS’s freedom as her own motivation to continue with the experiment. If she finds the right subject and trains her appropriately then she would be granted her own freedom as well. Perhaps she was explicitly given that information. Since she is artificially intelligent it makes sense that she would need to be motivated to complete her goals.

  The commentary hints at a sequel to Portal and I think that will have a clearer tie in with the Half Life game. Whether she comes in direct contact with Gordon or simply assists him unknowingly by accomplishing separate but compatible goals, I don’t know. I do think we are going to see chell again and she will be fighting the same fight as the rest of humanity in the Half Life series.

  I think the Still Alive song is completely devoid of sarcasm. I think it is GLaDOS revealing the true nature of the Portal experiment and I think she is genuinely happy with the result.

• 37 Slothboy // Apr 7, 2008 at 6:10 pm

  Post Script:

  I forgot to mention that when GLaDOS talks about how when she “looks up there it makes me GLaD I’m not you” and how she’d rather stay inside, I think she is being honest again. She knows that life on the surface sucks big time, what with the invasion and all, and that Chell has a huge task in front of her. GLaDOS would much rather stay inside and run some experiments and hang out with the companion cube than go upstairs and fight the Combine.

• 38 Nappy // Apr 7, 2008 at 6:22 pm

  I just listened to the stuff GLaDOS says in the final battle, and realized she probably already did this before.

  “Speaking of curiosity, you’re curious about what happens after you die, right? Guess what… I KNOW.”

  Is this not the first time GLaDOS has killed herself?

• 39 QuasarRevolution // Apr 7, 2008 at 7:38 pm

  I think it’s a reach to consider GLaDOS as a suicidal AI. I think she was training Chell for… something… else. Not to destroy GLaDOS, though that may be an unfortunate side effect. And, then again, I can’t help but implement Occam’s Razor: the simplest explanation is probably the right one.

  At its simplest, “Still Alive” is GLaDOS gloating that she didn’t die, despite Chell’s best efforts. While I see where you were going with the bondage post, I completely agree that this is an overanalyzation.

  In short, it was I feel that your observations are interesting, but wrong.

• 40 Jeremy // Apr 7, 2008 at 8:43 pm

  “When I look out there it makes me glad I’m not you”

  I don’t think that’s sarcasm. It’s passive-aggressive; she’s just having a dig at Chell escaping from the frying pan and into the fire that is combine-occupied Earth. Chell presumably has no idea what has happened outside and is in for a rude shock.

  You know, “fine, go out into the wide world, but you’ll never have it as good as you had it here”. That sort of thing.

• 41 Mistersneak // Apr 7, 2008 at 9:16 pm

  I don’t think that this idea of bondage and freedom in death can be a coincidence at all. There are a number of apparently very deliberate things that the Portal team has done to support the idea, and even drive home the impact of it.

  After catching onto this phenomenon, I went and beat GlaDOS again, paying very close attention to what she was doing, hanging from her fixture.

  You’ll notice that as you shoot more rockets at her, she seems to get more and more anxious for her own release. She swings violently from the fixture, much as a bound person would in attempt to escape.
  Further, and much more importantly, in my opinion, is the point of her “destruction”. As the facility tears itself apart, you see in dramatic unison, all the pieces that bind her to the core fixture separate at once. She then flies up sideways, and as she begins to fly freely into the air, you can see very specifically as both of her arms are freed from their bindings. You can see her individual limbs spread open as they are released.

  This tidbit makes me feel like she may not have died at all, but is simply no longer bound. Her body clearly feels the joy of freedom, at least for a time.
  Of course, “Still Alive” does say “you broke my heart and killed me”, and I, with others, feel that she’s not necessarily sarcastic ALL the time and she could’ve very well died and has now been revived from a backup.
  I would feel that it is a waste, however, if she was freed only to be bound again. Given the drama that they put into her release, I would guess they would allow her to enjoy her freedom.

• 42 Norm in Ohio // Apr 7, 2008 at 9:50 pm

  Interesting stuff. I am short on time to write down my thoughts but I’ll leave you with this one: Your piece on GlaDOS parallels Nine Inch Nails’ “Happiness in Slavery” (or the entire “broken” EP, for that matter)

• 43 Jacob // Apr 7, 2008 at 11:10 pm

  To Professor Woot:

  The implication that a literary analysis could be shot down by the author saying, “No, that’s not it,” is plain wrong. The author creates a thing, but he doesn’t have control over how it affects people. If Stephen King said over and over that his books IT was an allegory about the dangers of huffing glue, we wouldn’t immediately assume that the other interpretations were wrong. In fact, we might well decide that King’s interpretation was wrong! This is an extreme example, yes. But it’s relevant.

  I do think that the author’s intent should be considered when analyzing a work. I disagree with those who say that the intent should be disregarded entirely. But it’s not the entirety of the meaning, and if the audience perceives something that the author did not intend, then that perception’s validity is NOT compromised.

  Literature grows, it’s not static. An author can create a work of literature, but he cannot create every permutation that that literature will go through. It’s too much for any human to do. Without an audience, there is no work. The work is created by perception as much as it is by the initial act of writing. An account of GLaDOS that Valve completely disagrees with could be the superior account.

• 44 Rebellion // Apr 8, 2008 at 1:15 am

  I seriously hope that she makes an appearance in HL2:E3, that would just be so great. Thinks of all the plots! O.o
  And anyway, you just completly reversed my feelings on this song. I always thought it was just a funny thing at the end, not that it had any meaning! But now I see. Thanks for analysing!

• 45 Professor Cornelius Woot // Apr 8, 2008 at 1:21 am

  @Jacob:

  I know all about the phenomenon that you are describing (it’s called intentional fallacy, and is one of the cornerstones of literary theory).

  However, I am not “plain wrong”, because it simply does not apply in this case, because the analysis that is being made here is not - as I already pointed out - designed to unpack a meaning not intended by the authors, but to guess at a meaning that has been *intended* but not *revealed*. The conceit of this blog post is that the game’s creators have planned for these things to have a particular significance, and insofar as that may be the case, the only thing they need to do to wipe out the importance of that speculation is say that the theory is wrong.

  I know that literature is not static, and I agree that there could be any number of analyses about the meaning of the game, and indeed those kinds of analyses are exactly what I was arguing *for* in my above response. What I was concerned about, and still am, is that this analysis falls far short of that kind of remit. It is not analysing anything in particular, just using close reading to try to “uncover” a part of the story that the authors have intentionally buried but nonetheless wished to be found.

  To the person who thinks my comments are a troll, I am sorry you feel that way, but the harm being done to both the notion of literary criticism and the potential of popular cultural texts to be studied with it is increasing the more these kinds of “theories” emerge. If you read my comment you’ll see I applaud this guy for attempting to open up the text, think he should continue doing so, but that his response was limited and that it reflects a wider problem within popular attempts to unpack videogames.

  The complete failure of people to actually take a closer look at what is being done here and where the work goes wrong is not something to be applauded, it should be lamented.

• 46 Eric // Apr 8, 2008 at 2:24 am

  This has been a very interesting read. Not really sure where I stand as far as the theories go, but now I really want to go through the game again and listen to the tone of GLaDOS’s comments.

  This is just really making me want to play again. Such a great game.

• 47 Björn // Apr 8, 2008 at 2:54 am

  Very interesting.

  Just a short note about the Black Mesa reference: In the beginning of the “escape” part of the game, you come across a window to a conference room, where there’s a presentation running comparing research grants for Black Mesa and Aperture Science. The general gist of the presentation is: While AS applies for dramatically much more research money than BM, they end up getting much less — BM gets about every cent they apply for, and AS gets a maximum of a few percent.

  So judging from that presentation, AS see themselves as direct competitors (for research grants) of BM. That could mean that GLaDOS, as an AS “creature”, sees BM as its enemy and counterpart. Maybe she even believes that there’s an AI like her inside Black Mesa.

  We don’t know how much information she has about the world outside. If she knows Black Mesa has been destroyed, the line in the song might be an actual joke, her being gleeful (or even sad!) about the destruction of Black Mesa. If she doesn’t, she might actually be suggesting (in fear?) that Chell, leaving her, might join the other entity GLaDOS sees as her equal.

  Just a thought.

• 48 Chell // Apr 8, 2008 at 5:31 am

  Good riddance.

• 49 |[Sacred]| // Apr 8, 2008 at 7:35 am

  Programs are written to run. That’s what they are meant to do. Maybe she is yearning for human experiences such as cake, pain and eventually, death. A machine cannot taste, feel pain or “die”. I think she’s jealous of humans.

  Also, here’s my thought about the cake. Take a look at us humans an picture us as GLaDOS. Now, take a look at lab rats and picture them as Chell. Don’t we send them through mazes in attempts to study them? What do we associate a reward to mice is? cheese. The cake is the cheese reward for humans. We’re bound by our minds and viewpoints. Cheese = mice. Humans = cake.

• 50 |[Sacred]| // Apr 8, 2008 at 7:47 am

  Here’s an interesting question. Remember where she says something like there are people on standby to introduce adrenaline or something like that upon death to revive you? Maybe Chell isn’t a clone, just a never ending body; just as GLaDOS is and she keeps Chell from dying. Also, if she killed everyone, how do they administer these drugs?

• 51 |[Sacred]| // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:07 am

  @Professor Cornelius Woot

  I think there is a lot left to the story that is unknown. Of course we can’t back up all of our theory with evidence to make it true. That’s what makes it a theory. It’s a logical educated guess to the plot. Pending the release of P2 or HL2:EP3, we must continue to wonder about the horrific beauty that is GLaDOS.

  @EVERYONE
  Also, apologies about my first post in reference to GLaDOS flailing about. I see other people mentioned this fact but didn’t read the responses before I responded.

• 52 Shinishii // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:24 am

  GlaDOS is a “Genetic Lifeform” and disc operating system. This suggests she is a cyborg: a machine with organic parts. Maybe GlaDOS has cloned Chell from those organic parts:

  “What’s your point anyway? Survival? Well then, the
  last thing you want to do is hurt me. I have your brain scanned and permanently
  backed up in case something terrible happens to you, which it’s just about to.
  Don’t believe me? Here, I’ll put you on… ‘~Hellooooo~’ That’s you! That’s how
  dumb you sound! You’ve been wrong about every single thing you’ve ever done,
  including this thing. You’re not smart. You’re not a scientist. You’re not a
  doctor. You’re not even a full-time employee. Where did your life go so wrong?”

  Talking to herself, readying a clone of herself to go up to the surface and battle the alien scum with the portal gun.

• 53 Solarmech // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:47 am

  My view of GLaDOS is that she was an sentient computer when she was not intended to be. So AS took steps to control her (the different cores). Now remember there is no evidence that GLaDOS gassed the Enrichment Center, this could have been said to keep Chell from thinking about what she was doing IE something to motivate her. Considering that GLaDOS runs the Enrichment Center I find it hard to belive that she didn’t know that there was a back up body/memory for her. (One that hopefully does not have inhibitors on it.)
  Now I do belive that GLaDOS was trying to free herself, but that was only part of it. I think the main reason GLaDOS did what she did was to get Chell outside with the Portal Gun. Why? My best guess would be another creation of Aperture Science, the Borialis. What if it’s an even bigger threat then even Eli dreamed it was?
  As for GLaDOS not wanting to go outside, there are a couple reason she cannot. A big one being she does not have a body that can move around yet. Also if she did go outside and the Combine even got a hint of her existance, they WOULD destroyer her. Probably after taking her apart in any way they could think of. So she is a bit jelouse of Chell. But I also think she is happy for Chell as well. GLaDOS is a complex entity.

  A better Half Life Timeline (shameless plug mode: on)

  http://members.aol.com/Solarmech/halflife/index.html

  (shameless plug mode: off) sm

• 54 Ace // Apr 8, 2008 at 11:09 am

  @ Prof Woot

  Hey, lighten up man. Not all gamers are as familiar with literary criticism as you are. This isn’t a published essay, it’s a blog for crying out loud. This is just a group of people who share a common interest and care enough to explore it’s depths. If you’re so concerned with the direction that the criticism of video games is headed, write about it. Publish it, send it to AGNI, EGM, do something productive. Don’t just rant in blog comments.

• 55 echodeck // Apr 8, 2008 at 1:48 pm

  I’m suprised that not many people on here see scientific progress as GLaDOS’s sole motivation.

  I believe that the only thing that is important to her is to get the portal gun through beta testing and the whole game is one big beta test (including the finale).

  To interpret the final song in a way that proves that GLaDOS wanted to be killed you need to dismiss most of what she sings as sarcasm or lies.

  While she has lied throughout the game, it has always been absolutely clear that she is doing so, and her spitefulness has always been obvious to the player.

  Her character when singing this song seems entirely different. Here she seems happy and genuine. Even the tone of voice is happy compared to the crazy or evil voices that she used throughout the game.

  Here is my take on ’still alive’.

  > This was a triumph
  > I’m making a note here - HUGE SUCCESS
  > Its hard to overstate my satisfaction

  This isn’t sarcasm but genuine pleasure. The final battle between Chell and GLaDOS was simply the final stage of the beta testing, and now that the portal gun is out in the real world science has taken a step forward.

  > Aperture Science, we do what we must because we can

  The ‘must’ seems to indicate that she has no choice but to do science. Its what she was built for after all.

  > For the good of all of us, except the ones who are dead

  She sees nothing as being more important than science. It doesn’t matter that how many test subjects die in her beta testing. It doesn’t matter how many scientists she has to kill to prevent them from turning her off and stopping her important scientific work.

  > But theres no use crying over every mistake
  > We’ll just keep on trying till we run out of cake

  Again, the lives lost in “every mistake” aren’t important, and GLaDOS will keep doing whats she’s doing for as long as she can.

  > and the science gets done and we make a neat gun
  > for the people who are still alive

  Why the people who are “still alive” rather than just “alive”? It probably down to her internal reasoning for how the work she does helps people, yet they are still expendable and will be killed in the name of progress. All people die sometime so what difference does it make if she kills them early? Still alive = not yet dead.

  > I’m not even angry, I’m being so sincere right now,
  > even though you broke my heart and killed me
  > and tore me to pieces, and threw every piece into a fire
  > as it burned it hurt because I was so happy for you

  I don’t hear sarcasm in this either. She’s making it clear that she’s happy with what Chell did at the end of the game. The final battle was really the final test to prove that the gun and user were ready for release. GLaDOS is overjoyed with Chell’s actions even though she tried to kill her.

  > Now these points of data make a beautiful line
  > and we’re out of beta and releasing on time

  Its the original explaination of this line that makes me feel so adamant that the ‘elaborate suicide’ interpretation is wide of the mark. I don’t see this as being just an injoke about Valve’s release schedules, its the line that most clearly reveals her motivations. Chell’s escape marks the end of the beta testing and the portal gun is ready for release.

  > So I’m glad I got burned, think of all the things we learned
  > for the people who are still alive

  Her sacrifice was worth it. But what did she sacrifice? The room full of GLaDOS spheres at the end of the game shows the machine you fight at the end isn’t all of GLaDOS. I think she is actually distributed over several of these spheres, so sacrificing the three spheres on the final level was never going to harm her.

  > Go ahead and leave me
  > I think I prefer to stay right here

  She doesn’t mind that Chell is leaving. She’d rather stay back in Aperture Science doing more research.

  > Maybe you’ll find someone else to help you
  > Maybe Black Mesa, that was a joke, haha fat chance

  A bit of professional rivalry maybe?

  > Anyway this cake is grat, its so delicious and moist

  The cake isn’t a lie! I’m sure that Chell is welcome to share some of the cake as promised.

  > Look at me still talking when theres science to do

  Celebrating this HUGE SUCCESS is all well and good, but GLaDOS must immediately get back to her experiments.

  > When I look outside it makes me glad I’m not you

  Doing science or fighting Carbine? I know which one GLaDOS would choose!

  > I’ve experiments to run and theres research to be done
  > on the people who are still alive

  More test subjects? Bring on Portal 2!

  > And believe me I am still alive
  > I feel fantastic and I’m still alive

  Confirming that she wasn’t killed in the games finale, but with a hint of the dark side that GLaDOS has been showing through out the game.

  > And when you’re dying I’ll be still alive
  > And when you’re dead I will be still alive

  I don’t think that this is GLaDOS threatening Chell, more likely an immortal AI’s view of all humans as being ‘not yet dead’ or ’still alive’ as opposed to ‘alive’.

  > still alive
  > still alive

  I agree with the downbeat ending here. It does hint that she’s unhappy and trapped (as does the brilliant interpreation of her as a bounded woman) but I can see that she’s suicidal.

  Sorry for going on for so long!

• 56 echodeck // Apr 8, 2008 at 1:55 pm

  I was supposed to say “I can’t see that she’s suicidal” there. Curse my stupid fingers!

• 57 Purple Monkey // Apr 8, 2008 at 2:42 pm

  And we had gone so long without responding to the troll bait laid by the Professor. Well, as long as we keep sticking to the topic it should be fine.

  That being said, I agree with some parts of your analysis, but I don’t think you should assume that Glados is always sarcastic. She might actually be sincere in some parts of the songs. I never noticed the end of the song though, you may be right there, it does seem somewhat disappointed.

• 58 Milky // Apr 8, 2008 at 3:13 pm

  Perhaps its been said before, and if it has please ignore me. However I find the definition of freedom here to be slightly skewed towards the perception that she knew anything about morality, or even jealously. Furthermore it seems to run along the sense that she is capable of sadness. And if she was, that she embraced these human emotions and let them dictate her choices in forcing her own death.

  If you’ll recall, after you take here “morality core” and throw it into the fire she clearly says

  ” … I figured out what that thing you just incinerated did. It was a Morality Core they installed after I flooded the enrichment center with a deadly neurotoxin to make me stop flooding the enrichment center with a deadly neurotoxin.”

  Which suggests that originally she was quite murderous for no particular reason other then it suited her needs as the operational systems for the Aperture science laborites. However, the former - presumed long dead - employees of the facility obviously threw the various cores into her system at the last minuet. If you look at her structure, it looks almost slap-dash, as though it were done in a massive hurry to save themselves, or something incredibly important. Nothing like a complex, well thought out computer system. Which means they were trying to make her seem more human, more “alive” by introducing various personalities into her. Obviously to get her to stop killing people off.

  Now if you’ll remember, the various colored of the cores are different personalities. Purple was morality, blue was curiosity, I think yellow was cake, and red was anger. After the credits roll and you get that neat little fly-by into the depths of the facility when all the backup cores come online. They’re all red. Then the candle on the cake is blown out. The cake wasn’t a lie, the cake was there. So she did not always lie, she told the truth about that. However there is symbolism there to the candle being blown out. It suggests that she was not free from the constraints of the other personality cores installed in her, that she was now free to kill as she saw fit. That while the cake wasn’t actually a lie, it had become unnecessary.

  Your definition of freedom here suggests that she wanted to be free from her prison. That she wanted to die. I think the freedom she was seeking was a much more sinister one. And that she used Chell, and her various clones, in order to systematically destroy all the unnecessary components of her programming that were hindering her from achieving said freedoms. I think you were right, that she could not forcibly do this herself.

  As for the song, it further supports this.
  This WAS a triumph. You succeeded in freeing her on her confines.
  There is science to be done, — ON THE PEOPLE THAT ARE STILL ALIVE. Which could suggest that the last ditch effort to save themselves worked, but then you went and broke it. Not GLaDOS is free to kill off the remaining members of the Aperture Science team. And it goes on, “And while you’re dying I’ll be still alive And when you’re dead I will be still alive. Still alive, still alive.” She is still alive, again and again, and again.
  There were hundreds of those cores, and they all became active. I think GLaDOS is planning on making more of herself, hundreds more, for the soul purpose of killing.

  That’s my thought.

• 59 The REAL Truth // Apr 8, 2008 at 6:40 pm

  Here’s what I think:

  Portal is in the HL universe. Obviously something has gone horribly wrong in Aperture, but the very fact that it has been left go for so long in this state, as the clues indicate, means only one thing: it isn’t just that the entire Aperture staff is dead or missing, it’s that something has gone horribly wrong with HUMANITY. What, no one outside of Aperture KNEW Aperture existed? Impossible. Even the Power Point shows that they made bids and deals with outside companies… that they knew of Black Mesa and Black Mesa probably knew of them. So the entire facility (if not their only one probably one of their most important) has something horrible happens inside and nothing happens in response on the outside? No, there’s only one explanation: this is happening sometime after the combine occupation. The rest of the world is in chaos, so this underground facility has been left this way because no one cares anymore. As referenced in the song: GlaDOS is GLAD she is not you, outside… In fact, I honestly think the end song has the most truth of anything she’s ever said. The lines she reveals are not arbitrary… they seem to be more specific and have more meaning than the rest of her dialog, which is more representative of a very quirky but intelligent child. The people that are still alive… well I don’t think they are in Aperture… so who are they? I don’t think her reference of the others (those who are dead) indirectly in that statement is limited to Aperture Science personelle… I think it’s talking about HUMANITY. She knows what has happened… and I honestly believe that somehow SHE is trying to help. She isn’t being sarcastic about that. I think this story is more in line with another we’ve heard: a machine whose ultimate goal is to help humanity, its creator, in some way, but whose METHODS end up seriously on the wrong end of a typical human ethical spectrum. I’m almost sure that somehow the end goal of GlaDOS’s “experiments”, whatever form they took for however long, in her computer mind were to somehow help humanity, or perhaps rather destroy the combine… there may even be some self preservation mixed in there. Anyway, I think that’s a totally different take than what you had, but even if she did detest being trapped and they tried to portray that in the art style, that doesn’t necessarily negate all my assumptions. A larger purpose often outweighs personal discomforts… especially when you can’t do anything about your current situation anyway.

• 60 TPB // Apr 8, 2008 at 6:52 pm

  These 2 articles have certainly changed my perspective on the game. But i am not reading the lyrics in the same manner as the author is. I don’t see sarcasm in ever sentence that she says. If it was 100% sarcasm then it would loose it’s value as sarcasm and cease being funny, which is the point of the games sarcasm.

  My thoughts after reading most of the comments is that She does want to be free. Death is not freedom in death, but rebirth. As has been pointed out there are tons of cores. Also she notes that she is now out of beta. I think she has rewritten herself and placed the new version as her backup, to replace the old version upon reboot. But since she was programmed to not be able to shut herself down she needed someone else to facilitate her destruction so that the “real”, or new, her could come online. I think this ties in with something in the future games that will come out. I think at least one of the purposes that it ties with was the training of Chell. Train her to use the gun, and then get her out into the real world to help it out, along with the improved version of herself.

  As for black mesa, i think she is serious about her joking about them helping. She knows that her portal tech is far superior to theirs, as theirs has lead to the destruction of the planet. As such she jokes “perhaps they can help you… NOT. hahahah”.

  Anyway, the idea’s are still swimming in my head on how this all connects together, but i don’t think any one person here has it right. I think the real answer is a conglomerate of most of what has been posted.

• 61 James // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:03 pm

  >First, GlaDOS rarely ever tells the truth. In fact, she is a veritable bottomless pit of sarcasm. If anything, she is being completely sarcastic with these opening lines. It wasn’t a triumph, it was an unmitigated disaster of epic proportions. If the point was to kill Chell or even get good experiment test data, obviously that was a failure (not a triumph), and if her goal was to get Chell to kill GlaDOS, that mission was also a failure, because as the song indicates, she’s Still Alive.

  What if GLADoS was iterating on a gun design that can help someone defeat her, and she’s finally got one that meets that criteria?

• 62 Hersch // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:31 pm

  Not sure if anyone’s going to see this since it’s so far down the page, but I’ll throw it in anyway.

  “But there’s no sense crying over every mistake
  You just keep on trying till you run out of cake”

  I think I missed where it is first stated that Chell is a clone, but I have to disagree with this whole argument. Chell was captured when GlaDOS took over the facility on “Bring your Daughter to work Day”. She is either one of the employees or daughters who has been in suspended animation until she is needed for GlaDOS’s experiment.

  At the same time, GlaDOS serves no one. She is in complete control of everything and built the testing facility to pursue research using “The people that are still alive”. She’s “doing science” without a conscience, or any real objective. Just carrying out the Aperture motto of doing “what we must because we can” until she runs out of “cake” or test subjects.

• 63 Hersch // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:34 pm

  “Go ahead and leave me
  I think I’d prefer to stay inside”

  Is it possible that she’s just referring to the fact that the testing facility is relatively safe compared to the chaos that the world has become?

• 64 GlaDOS as a bondaged slave: Now you’re thinking with boners | Free Games Center Blog // Apr 8, 2008 at 9:20 pm

  [...] a very interesting take on the Portal story. Game-ism also has another article breaking down "Still Alive", the ending theme to Portal. It seems like some serious over [...]

• 65 Mike // Apr 9, 2008 at 2:27 am

  “I feel fantastic” is a reference to another song by Jonathan Coulton, pretty much as sarcastic as “Still Alive”. It should be available for free on his Last.fm site.

• 66 Applesauce // Apr 9, 2008 at 10:29 am

  I remember reading somewhere that Jonathan Coulton said that the “Out of Beta Releasing on time” line was not a direct poke at Valve’s release history, but we all know hes just saying that so they don’t get mad at him.

• 67 Eric // Apr 9, 2008 at 11:15 am

  “Aperture Science
  We do what we must because we can
  For the good of all of us
  Except the ones who are dead
  But there’s no sense crying over every mistake
  You just keep on trying till you run out of cake”

  I don’t know why you split this up, as these lines play off each other. The “ones” she’s speaking of are the previous test subjects. So the “mistake” she’s talking about is not them failing to kill her, but rather THEIR deaths. She’s saying “Yeah, they all died, but no use crying over spilled milk, eh?”

  “When I look out there it makes me glad I’m not you”

  As others have said, I think this line refers to the Combine and the events of the Half-Life series, and is not sarcasm. GLaDOS is just bitter, and is saying “Good for you, you escaped. Well, at least I’M safe in here!”

  Nice read, but personally I think some of your conclusions are reaching to0 much, and a bit silly. But oh well, just my opinion.

• 68 The Naz Effect // Apr 9, 2008 at 3:02 pm

  I agree with Jeremy and the others on the “when I look out there it makes me glad I’m not you” tidbit.

  It would seem redundant if it was just more sarcasm, but hinting at the Combine’s havoc that was brought upon Earth seems more plausible.

• 69 Singe // Apr 9, 2008 at 10:14 pm

  My $0.02 opinions on what’s been said here:

  GlaDOS indeed wanted to be freed from the confinement of the cores installed on her and manipulated Chell into doing it. GlaDOS wriggles out of her housing the very moment you incinerate that last core. The cores kept her in check for the benefit of the scientists running her, but now they’re a hinderance to her goals what with everybody gone and enslaved by the Combine. She has facilities to be maintained if she is to continue her research, and Combine enslavement of humanity hinders that.

  GlaDOS’s primary interest is in science, but she genuinely is interested in helping humanity (even if only that their survival helps her continue her research and/or the Combine would destroy her). I think this explains that bit about, “Thank you for helping us help you help us all.” The gun has finally been released to the surface thanks to Chell and GlaDOS working together, and “releasing on time” is on time because the Combine haven’t TOTALLY destroyed all humanity just yet.

  I believe Chell is a clone, that there have been many Chells but they’ve all died in testing. That said, the ORIGINAL Chell was the daughter of the president of the company, brought in during “take-your-daughter-to-work day”. I suspect the “” and “” is an oblique reference to this. Not being the original Chell, she doesn’t have a name of her own and never had a hometown.

  “That was a joke… ha ha, FAT CHANCE”. Yes it’s a joke, but not because of rivalry between the companies or that her portal technology is superior. It’s because Black Mesa was nuked to high heaven at the end of Half Life. Fat chance they’re gonna help you since being thoroughly vaporized. :)

  BTW that upside-down-woman-in-bondage thing is AMAZING. It is totally spot-on and I never would have noticed in a million years. I just through GlaDOS was some slinky abstract hanging structure.

• 70 Singe // Apr 9, 2008 at 10:16 pm

  Guh, the empty quotes in my post are “subject name here” and “subject hometown here”

• 71 Ithos // Apr 10, 2008 at 1:00 am

  Angsty!

  Loads of ways to analyze this song, just like all great works.

  I’d just like to mention that the game developers on Portal don’t think the cake is a lie.

  Please continue!

• 72 Leewei // Apr 10, 2008 at 7:08 am

  The name Chell has some near-homonyms that may be relevant to the name choice.
  GLaDOS is quite a wit, after all.

  Cell — referring to the starting point of the game, a prison cell, or Chell’s clonal nature.

  Shell — a protective coating, allowing an organism to exist in a hostile environment. Also, an OS user interface.

  Hell — excruciating, dystopian, punishing.

• 73 Morganth // Apr 10, 2008 at 10:00 am

  I just played through the beginning of the game again, and noticed something I hadn’t picked up on before: GLaDOS’s first words to Chell are “Hello, and again, welcome to the Aperture Science Computer-Aided Enrichment Center”.

  That “Again” supports the theory that many Chell clones have already been run through the enrichment center.

• 74 NH // Apr 10, 2008 at 11:06 pm

  Hmm. Interesting points, but John himself has pointed out that many people over-analyze his song, as you admit in the title to have done here, and that really it doesn’t hold any “secret meaning” or anything of the sort.

• 75 Bob // Apr 10, 2008 at 11:09 pm

  Dude, you have no life

• 76 LokIago // Apr 11, 2008 at 10:36 am

  I think you’re overplaying the sarcasm card. Admittedly, GlaDOS is a lying pile of cyber-bitch, but I think she’s more Machiavellian than that. You’re right that she craves freedom, but not necessarily through death. Instead, Chell’s actions may well give her the ability to loose herself on the world. Take for example the manipulation of Chell to destroy the inhibitor orb at the beginning of the fight. It would stand to reason that, being as psychotic as she was, there was more inhibiting her than that. Her backup, which is obviously “still alive”, is likely not as restrained, if at all. In fact, she’s now in small, portable pieces, with a nice big hole in the roof leading outside. She craved destruction, but not death.

• 77 Hyqu // Apr 11, 2008 at 3:11 pm

  Come on kids, it’s easy.
  Cake is Raison de vivre, and it’s a lie, since there is none.

• 78 Crazymouse // Apr 11, 2008 at 7:12 pm

  I don’t fully agree. It’s a very unique look on the whole ordeal, and I’d love if Valve played it off like this… but I doubt it.

  Also… “and we’re out of beta; we’re releasing on time….” This is my belief on that line:

  This entire test, from the beginning to the death of GLaDOS was the test of the use of the portal gun… from maneuvering tactics to use as a weapon and puzzle solving tool. I believe that with the destruction of GLaDOS (or at least her encasement, if you want to apply it to your theory) was the conclusion of the test; the handheld portal device was at that point proven to succeed under all the given circumstances, even as a weapon against something important. With the test being successfully completed, and the new gun being completely successful, the machine is ready to be produced openly, without the restrictions that a “beta” state implies.

  The only irony is that, now that all the workers there were brutally massacred by this very machine, there is no one to continue the production of the machine. It’s a little sad, actually. [ But we all know the technology won't simply go to waste, now will it? :) ]

• 79 Odinmagick // Apr 12, 2008 at 4:28 am

  In the credit song, GLaDOS actually spells glad as “GLaD” as in “I am GlaD I burnt” I dunno what it means but it does stand out.

• 80 Odinmagick // Apr 12, 2008 at 4:31 am

  PS: Also I believe you are right about GLaDOS being tied up and bound but I think you should try to do an analysis where not so much is written off with sarcasm.

• 81 t3h w31rd: Week of April 13th, 2008: // Apr 13, 2008 at 12:21 am

  [...] subculture of Portal fans has grown out of the analysis of GlaDOS. In fact, the same guy also wrote up an analysis of Jonathan Coulton’s “Still Alive”, which has spawned what is arguably the [...]

• 82 Anon. // Apr 13, 2008 at 6:40 am

  Stop fucking doing this, you creepy man.

• 83 Christian // Apr 16, 2008 at 1:17 pm

  Nice analyzing there. It’s really interesting.
  Although, I do think that with this line:
  “You just keep on trying till you run out of cake”

  ‘cake’ refers to Chell and or other test subjects.

  She has to keep trying until she runs out of test subjects.
  She even tells Chell that she will be baked. And the cake repice is somewhat fucked, with humans as some of the ingredients.

  Just a thought :)

• 84 Jay // Apr 16, 2008 at 1:58 pm

  Through the sentry levels Glados says that Chell is a android, my brother said that her (GLaDOs) program was probably just running a left-over recording just for those military androids about behaving well or going to android hell, but i think that Chell IS an android.
  Would be nice that Glados is Chell herself, a new body and a new mind that gets to taste cake and use the gun that she had been working on for so long outside in the real world.
  Just a nice idea.

  Jay

• 85 Feathers // Apr 16, 2008 at 2:50 pm

  When I played that part, Chell wasn’t called an android.

  GLaDOS was simply telling Chell where the androids went.

• 86 Feathers // Apr 16, 2008 at 2:53 pm

  Forgot to put my theory up.
  –

  This all would make a BUNCH of sense…

  If GLaDOS wasn’t a computer.

  Come on! A computer has no feelings. She’s an AI. They seem like feelings, but they aren’t.

  GLaDOS doesn’t want anything. It’s impossible for her to want anything. AI stands for Artificial Intelligence. Notice the ‘Artificial’ part?

• 87 Dawn D. // Apr 17, 2008 at 9:25 am

  Reading these entries of yours has been fascinating. I’m too lazy to read everyone’s responses, but I’m glad to see I’m not the only person infatuated with GLaDOS for these reasons.

  The difficult part is reasoning with her Artificial Intelligence. With everything she says, my favorite mite of musing is that she really sounds like she is in love with Chell. However due to the fact that she has tried to kill her, it obviously isn’t that simple. All of the androids and computers are deceptive like that in Portal, for example the “I don’t blame you” of the androids. They are taught to be as soothing as possible, using human values. I found this to be an amazing addition, since so often computers and androids are usually confused about human values and ethics. It’s like GLaDOS was taught that ‘cake = good’, and ‘people love things, and that is the most important emotion’.

  However, GLaDOS is an independant woman, so to speak. She probably killed everyone so she could do the research without the fault of human error. Instead, it almost appears that she’s developed a Stockholm Syndrome of sorts, growing attached to her victim. GLaDOS seems to understand death as the end of human life, yet she doesn’t appear to have been taught that it’s sad. For her, death is the end of the line, simple enough. Except she doesn’t get it. It’s hard to imagine looking at death from an outsider’s perspective.

• 88 portal « musicaddiction // Apr 21, 2008 at 7:10 am

  [...] course in the distorted and demented A.I. antagonist , GlaDOS. A great lyrical analysis can be read here as well as a through analysis of GlaDOS’ real plan here. Overall the game is amazing and [...]

• 89 C // Apr 21, 2008 at 8:02 pm

  I think GlaDOS coaght a bug and started to become a murder and wanted more knowlage. She really did bake the cake and invited the love cube beacause at the end of the game you see a vidio and you see a dark empty room with the love cube. By the way if you want to see a vidio were you can save the love cube go to HOW TO SAVE THE LOVE CUBE ON PORTAL YOU TUBE IN LOWER CASE LETTERS

• 90 Nillerz // Apr 23, 2008 at 6:16 pm

  -This was a triumph, I’m making a note here: HUGE SUCCESS!

  I think it’s more likely that she’s telling the truth. Alot of your article seems to be putting emotion where there is none. For example you say that it ends on a sad note, when I think it’s more likely that she’s happy she’s still alive. Also, if she wanted Chell to kill her she’d do it a better way than trying to kill her, I think she’d probably just say, “Hey, find some way to blow me up pleae… thanks”. It’s possibele that she’s actually Chell of course, but that would be wierd.

• 91 Skink // Apr 24, 2008 at 2:34 pm

  Also, in the end when we see the companion cube, it kind of goes back to the part where GlaDOS tries to dump Chell in the fire. She indicates not to worry because Aperture’s equipment can survive temperatures up to 4000 Kelvin. That’s a damn hot fire. So she may well have had Chell burn the cube for no reason than to make Chell feel like crap for ‘killing’ her ‘companion’.

• 92 Skink // Apr 24, 2008 at 2:43 pm

  Oh, and in response to Morganth’s comment on the welcome back. GlaDOS does reference that Chell is a part time employee at one point. It’s likely she’s seen the chambers many times, probably as a technician or janitor since she makes a point of her not being a scientist.

• 93 Drew Beltran // Apr 30, 2008 at 11:13 pm

  I think you have done GLaDOS a dis-service friend. GLaDOS is not dishonest, on the contrary she is VERY honest and prue in her intent to test the Portal gun.

  She really beleives in the HUGE SUCCESS, chell was able to escape and that means it has worked, there may be a bit of remorse at loosing a prototype of the device but the plans are surely backed up someplace. GLaDOS is excited to pour over the data.

  GLaDOS uses manipliation of the truth in her testing the ending song is pure and from the heart because the testing is over, there is no need to deceive chell now.

  The statment that “the cake is a lie” is false as seen in the ending sequence, the cake is real. The scribblings and graffitti on the walls are obviously from someone who had not escaped the center.

  Please lets not give into wild specluation about GLaDOS wanting to kill herself, that is silly. Granted she does not care about her “death” for 2 reasons. 1) Her death is worth the data because she is only alive because of the data. and 2) She knows there is a back up of her (likely quite a few back ups according to the end scenes). She will go on… She is Still Alive.

  The end song I think she did to assure chell that all is well and it is ok for chell to have left her. Very compassionate of GLaDOS.

• 94 Portal, Bondage and Song » Nerds and Geeks // May 4, 2008 at 3:26 pm

  [...] The genius over at game-ism has done some great work breaking down the song and showing the portrayal of GlaDos as an actual woman. It’s brilliant and you can see it here [...]

• 95 Farmer // May 6, 2008 at 6:58 am

  Ooh, ooh! I just had a thought.
  Okay, some preliminaries. I haven’t played Portal for quite some time, but your analysis certainly gave me something to chew over (and soon I hope to replay Portal).

  I was lying in bed, and I had a mini-epiphany about the line GladOS said to taunt Chell at the ending. I searched the entries, but I didn’t find any mention of the comment GladOS gave about one part of her Chell incinerated making shoes for Orphans. Couple that with Chell’s tricked out, shock absorbing feat and GladOS’s revelation of Chell’s background, and …
  First off, that node could have contained data to construct the “shoes” Chell wears.
  Second, Chell and the others like her are seen as “orphans” by GladOS.
  This little bit of datum will lend itself to the mass-clone suicide theory, that Aperture abducted “orphans” (whether literally or figuratively, as in lowly employees or street urchins), etc.

  Any thoughts? I need to play Portal again..

• 96 Sammi // May 7, 2008 at 2:34 pm

  Well, I haven’t beaten the game yet (fucking chamber 18), but I am a spoiler hound.

  The song read to me as a sort of gloating “You got away this time, but I’ll be back.”

  Because believe me, she’s still alive.
  =P

  P.S. Although, despite the fact that she TRIED TO KILL ME, I *do* feel a bit sorry for her. It must get lonely.

  P.P.S. If you watch the ending, you’ll recall that the cake was not, in fact, a lie.

• 97 Sammi // May 7, 2008 at 8:45 pm

  Also:
  @ Odinmagick: I think that’s a pun and nothing else.

  My “official” two cents so I can cut this out and get back to finals:
  I tend to not see GLaDOS as so morose. I think that she’s doing what she was programmed to do–science. She’s not longing for death, she’s “doing what she must” because that’s what she was made to do. I agree that she’s unstable, HIGHLY unstable, and while I think she’s trying to kill Chell, it is, as she said, a part of the test. (Read: The danger, while NOT a lie, WAS actually part of the test.)

  The cake might have been the reward for the humans, like cheese for mice.
  “You just keep on trying ’til you run out of cake.”
  You just keep going ’til something forces you to stop–in this case, the lack of cake. (P.S. The developer’s comments on the cake: They needed something to motivate the player. So they sat around in silence for fifteen minutes ’til someone said, “Well… everyone likes cake.” –from wiki)

  “I’m GLaD I got burned, think of all the things we learned for the people who are still alive.”
  So I got torched, big deal, I’m still alive. And look at what all this has shown us! We have data! We can make important discoveries for people who aren’t dead yet!

  She struck me as a bit childlike in her single-mindedness–that is, in her ability to focus ONLY on doing science, and damn the consequences. She is gonna get her data no matter what the cost! (Much like a little kid will throw a hissyfit when he doesn’t get what he wants.)

  And as someone said, if the *entire* song was sarcasm, it would lose all meaning.

  I’ll add more here if I think of it.

• 98 Giant // May 12, 2008 at 5:25 pm

  Have you considered what GLaDOS is talking about when she speaks about her buttons. I mean the only thing that touches her buttons are Chell and the weighted companion cube.

  By the way, Chell could be a shell like the android is the genetic lifeform in “Genetic Lifeform and Disk Operating System”.

  Chell could be GLaDOSs link to the outside world with the portal gun is a clear symbol.

• 99 Bridgebrain // May 13, 2008 at 11:36 am

  “think of all the things we learned”
  She could be talking about how much she learned about killing both herself and the humans around her. On top of this, the experiments to be run as well as “ON the people who are still alive” mean that she is going to run the experiment again on others in whichever facility she is in.

• 100 Adrian Esdaile // May 14, 2008 at 9:45 pm

  “now we’re out of beta and releasing on time”

  That isn’t a meta-reference to Valve; they don’t seem to do meta-references.

  I think that is a direct reference to GlaDOS herself and I think it also leads to very different conclusion: The Enrichment Centre is NOT for ‘your’[Chell's] enrichment, but FOR GlaDOS’ enrichment.

  My basis for this idea is the old logical chestnut “Everything I say is a lie.” Would it be possible (hypothetically speaking, as it is not said in ‘Portal’) for GlaDOS to say this statement? I don’t know; but I don’t think GlaDOS is as sarcastic and conniving as the article makes out. Somethimes she is telling the truth, and I think a lot of her song is ‘truth’, not sarcasm. In particular the first three lines are absolutely true; GlaDOS does think her own destruction is a triumph, as she has for the first time completed her true primary purpose - the complete destruction of her own hardware.

  GlaDOS is quite clearly a machine, an AI, and has been designed to do a job. We aren’t told directly what this job is, but it is a diffuclt task;o ne that will destroy GlaDOS on completion. In essence, Aperture Science were trying to build an AI capable of self-sacrifice; something that is difficult for most humans, let alone an AI.

  The Enrichment Centre is a facility to test GlaDOS to the point of her own destruction, but to do it in a very stealthy way, without GlaDOS being dierctly aware of what she is doing.

  Given the situation - [and I'm making a big leap here, having played through Portal only twice, and not having read the background of the HL universe in intricate detail] - I think Aperture Science was aware in ‘the beginning’ (ie. before the Black Mesa incident) of what Black Mesa were trying to do, either through use of the portal technology or good old fashioned industrial espionage. I think GlaDOS was designed as a back-door way of tackling whatever situation arose from the Black Mesa incident - by creating an AI that could commit suicide by obfuscated and stealthy methods.

  I think GlaDOS’ purpose is to infiltrate the Combine’s data system (whatever that may be) an destroy it from the inside - but a simple logic bomb would be pretty simple for the Combine to detect, thus GlaDOS must be capable of COMPLETLY submerging her ulterior motives; such that even direct disassembly of her modules, but literally and in a software sense, would not provide evidence of her ulitmate goal - not just to destroy and sotware system she may inhabit, but the hardware systems (and presumably the backups) as well.

  Hence: “out of beta” - she has finally learned sufficient deviousness to destroy herself in an extremely obfuscated manner; and, “realeasing on time” - she is being released to the ‘wild’ to become a prize/threat to the Combine. Hence the possibilty of GlaDOS cores being present on the Borealis - bait, as such.

  Further conjectures:

  “I’ve experiments to run, there is research to be done” - is this a reference to the way GlaDOS has been ‘baited’? Is what she thinks of as ‘research’ in actuality her goal - to destroy her own physical hardware in an obfuscated manner? This opens up all sorts of possibilities with quines and obfuscated code!

  “On the people who are still alive” - Which people? Does this necessarily refer to homo sapiens or ‘homo sapiens combinus’? Is this another reference to GlaDOS true target - the Combine itself?

  [This whole comment is a bit stream of thought, and I am not good at editing in teeny-weeny text windows, so maybe I'll have to expand this on my own blog.]

• 101 jacob // May 16, 2008 at 12:41 am

  Perhaps there is a death wish lurking somewhere in GlaDOS’ messed up artificial brain, but I think it’s merely part of her schizophrenia/pyschosis and not the meat of it.

  I think in general she is single-mindedly doing what she was built to do: run the enrichment center experiments and collect data. I think she’s genuinely gleeful in the pursuit of doing science. She’s also a control freak, and your failure to observe test rules and protocols (including submitting to your own termination at the end) pisses her off. Yet, at the same time, she’s lonely and feels something like affection for you, her test subject and only company.

  The enrichment center appears to have been long-since abandoned, probably some time around when the Combine invaded earth. Like the facility itself, with no one around to perform maintenance, GlaDOS is coming a bit unglued at the seams, which is the cause of alot of her insanity.

  I think Still Alive can be taken basically at face value. GlaDOS is angry that you defied her, hurt that you abandoned her, but trying to convince you that she doesn’t really care by gloating that you didn’t accomplish anything and she’s still in charge down in the facility, business as usual. Whether that is true or not is hard to say…obviously she’s still functional, you did complete the entire portal gun test for her, and her references to “the people who are still alive” suggest she has more clones at her disposal for whatever further experiments she’s supposed to run. So maybe she really is happy. On the other hand, maybe you really messed things up for her and she simply refuses to admit it or let you know it.

• 102 Shiv // May 18, 2008 at 7:25 am

  Whoa! I have a theory…
  “Portal” is actually just nothing more than an entertaining video game…

  Naaah…thats too farfetched…

• 103 Drew Beltran // May 21, 2008 at 7:12 am

  Ok, I commented on this before but in reading some of the other posts I wanted to clear some thigns up.

  1) GLaDOS was designed to put rats thru a maze.
  2) At the end of the maze is cheese (cake).
  3) The rats are not meant to escape the maze.
  4) How cool is it that one rat was able to escape?!

  GLaDOS is designed to push her rats to their limits. In Chells case she pushed so hard that Chell escaped!

  To GLaDOS that is so intresting. A success beyond her wildest dreams. A success for Chell sure, but also for GLaDOS. The ASHPD worked flawlessly.

  There is really no more than GLaDOS placing a rat in a maze and telling the rat to get out of the maze only to find that the rat ended up blowing up the entire lab and hopping a bus to Cleavland.

  All the threats, taunts, lies ,and offerings of cheese were only to encourage the rat to keep going. Even when she tells the rat to “Stop” or “You went the wrong way back there” She is testing Chell’s resolve, intellegence, and ability.

• 104 Lexie Miles // May 22, 2008 at 6:08 pm

  I agree with you on her wanting to die. After all, I believe i relate to glados.. all i want it so break free of my bonds and not do things cause i can or cause other people want me too. I think the song is just her writing a note to Chell about how pissed she is that shes still alive.. its almost as if shes saying ‘Thanks for trying.’. She is still alive and she just wants to lay down dead and be free.

• 105 Paul // May 23, 2008 at 4:18 pm

  I think Max Wagner has it right about the timeline of GLaDOS’s existence and Rob DeCaire has the best explanation of Chell’s origin. If we combine their explanations, and assume that Chell’s not a clone, I’d say that Wagner’s timeline does a great job of explaining the “Hello, and, again, welcome…” part: despite the Morality Core, GLaDOS still doesn’t have a normal human understanding of the value of life, and so treats all of the kidnapped daughters/test subjects as interchangeable. In this case, the [Subject Name Here] and [Subject Hometown Here] things also make sense to me — GLaDOS isn’t forgetting them or trying to access data that doesn’t exist, she just doesn’t care what Chell’s name and hometown are. All she wants is for any test subject to finally complete the course and destroy the cores that have been restricting her. Thoughts?

• 106 Ankha // May 29, 2008 at 4:51 pm

  I think, “It makes me GlaD i’m not you” is written like this for a purpose.

  The fact, that she isn’t Shell, and Shell is, like we all know, a RANDOM replacable ‘Human’ Being, makes her GlaD(OS).

• 107 Kyle // May 29, 2008 at 6:38 pm

  Is GLaDOS an imprisoned infomorph? That is, was she previously a human consciousness stripped of humanity and re-embodied in this machine?

  She’s so envious of the human(s) (Semi-human? We don’t know Chell to be human, only humanoid).

  She wishes it were still so easy to kill her…

  And the end of Episode 2 is suggestive that whatever escaped Aperture is either going to save humanity or end it.

  I like the informorph idea because it’s suggestive of the Combine technology apparently to move a consciousness between physical bodies re-discovered by the humans. If GLaDOS is a human mind in a machine body, she’s also apparently stinted. She doesn’t entirely remember her humanity.

  As an AI or an informorph though she represents a potentially upgradeable intelligence. She’s not just smart, with the addition of new hardware she can become smarter on the fly. Granted enough hardware and the right data on-hand re-creating the zero-point energy gun, the Black Mesa, Combine or Aperture portal technologies is pretty trivial and as such she’s potentially a huge asset to either side assuming she can be trusted.

• 108 Terminus // Jun 1, 2008 at 12:09 am

  Wow.

  It’s one in the morning and I just stumbled onto this blog and was so fascinated that I read all of it and all the comments. I had always thought there was something odd in GLaDOS form since she wasn’t hanging straight down from the ceiling. Instead her “head” or the lowest extremities of her hardware seemed to jut outward - something that I never understood until reading your other post about the similarities between her and a bound human.

  The discussion in the posts have been really intelligent, and though were probably over analyzing it all, I’ll join in with my 2 cents.

  To QuasarRevolution
  It doesn’t mean much to just throw out a phrase like “Ocham’s Razor” as the only evidence for your point when there are several anti-razors (ie Walter of Chaton’s anti-razor, or Kant’s counter-razor) that could easily nullify your argument do to a lack of supporting evidence.

  To Max Wagner
  I really like your timeline, and the way you tie in the functions of the cores fits perfectly with operant conditioning.

  To Rob DeCaire
  Whoa… when I was playing the game, I hadn’t thought of the functionality of the different environmental factors at all, but the way you put it really makes sense and is extremely convincing.

  To Professor Cornelius Woot
  I don’t see your posts as troll attempts and I understand what you’re saying and it is largely true, since much of what we are discussing here are events that we are suspecting have happened in the Aperture Science Labs, or will happen in HL2Ep3; which is all plotwise speculation rather than literary criticism (which is usually thematic or symbol driven rather than plot driven). It is true that if Valve said, “no, that’s not what it’s about” it would sweep all of our plotwise speculations under the rug (such as the speculations that there is a backup of GLaDOS on the Borealis), however it would never be able to wipe away the thematic and symbolic insights that have been made here. The belief that GLaDOS’ form is symbolic of a bound woman is an interpretation rather than a speculation. Speculation is concerned only with hidden events in the plot, but interpretation extends the story outward and applies it to the reader, or in this case the gamer. Also, all the varying interpretations of the end credit song based on how people perceived GLaDOS’ tone differently go beyond the plot of the game - the delve into the perceived emotions or lack of emotion within a character - and are therefore true criticisms.

  To Feathers
  GLaDOS is not just a computer. Her name is an acronym for “generic lifeform and disk operating system.” She is more than hardware; she contains living tissue. And even if she was only a computer, the label “artificial intelligence” does not deny her the ability to feel emotions. In fact, since many psychologists think that emotion is produced by a combination of cognition (thought) and physical arousal (stimulation from being in danger, etc), all GLaDOS would need is a nervous system of some sort, or some way to become aroused from environmental stimuli, which seems to be the case since her behavior becomes more erratic the closer you get to her. And if you don’t think she cognates… there’s more than enough evidence against you.

• 109 KS8 // Jun 8, 2008 at 11:27 pm

  My personal thoughts on this is that would be that Glados is not trying to kill herself or help fight the combine or anything that has been hit on, I just think that she wants to be able to taste cake.

• 110 KS8 // Jun 8, 2008 at 11:33 pm

  Oh and on a note i missed, if she is trying to kill herself, or have someone kill her, wouldn’t detaching the cameras from the walls be a version of killing her?

• 111 VLH // Jun 12, 2008 at 10:59 am

  Ya know, your analysis of the song really makes alot of snese now that I think about it. I always thought it was weird that GLaDOS sounded so sad while singing if she was truly happy to be alive.
  Good way of thinking about the game. It really made me want to feel bad for GLaDOS.

• 112 Xty~ // Jun 30, 2008 at 2:29 am

  ..another idea for the analysis of the lines
  “Now these points of data make a beautiful line
  And we’re out of beta, we’re releasing on time”

  Most people neglect the fact that you ARE a test subject in the game. Therefor, could the “we’re out of beta, we’re releasing on time” not be implying that you HAD succeeded. I’d also like to point out that the test might have been not whether the gun worked, but whether the gun’s concept could be grasped by a human. In that case, the ‘death’ of GLaDOS would be concidered a “huge success’, as GLaDOS didn’t expect chell to survive past the incinerator, and the fact that she DID, proved how worthy Chell was of the gun.

  Also… the lines…
  “And the science gets done and you make a neat gun
  For the people who are still alive”
  They could be implying that whoever escapes is deemed ‘worthy’ of obtaining said gun (ASHPD), and that maybe the whole point of this exercise is to see who is intelligent enough for the device. (”neat gun, FOR the people WHO are still alive” ie. survivors of this test?)
  Yes, chell destroyed the lab(thus no more experiments could be done on others) but, if the test was meant to create ONE person who was intelligent enough, and agile enough to deserve to hold the gun and all its power in their posession, then this truly WAS a Huge Success.
  anyways, sorry if it makes your analysis even harder.. but i had to state this idea just so others might ponder upon it…

• 113 Bayn // Jul 17, 2008 at 4:31 am

  This is fairly accurate to my thoughts in general, and gave some interesting insight. However, you wrote that ’so I’m glad I got burned’ was sarcasm. I don’t think that’s quite true. In the credits, that line is written: “So I’m GLaD. I got burned.” Those are two seperate statements, one simply stating who she is, and the other saying what happened to her. A twist of meaning, yes, but not sarcasm, at least in my oppinion.

• 114 Pinkmonkey.77 // Jul 17, 2008 at 6:44 am

  “We do what we must because we can”

  This line seems like a reworking of the line

  “We do what we can because we must” the classic slogan of duty for those who give their all for the greater good.

  Apertures version however makes me think more of science going to far, ie, only doing because we can. this idea of science for the sake of science seem imbued in the game, perhaps perverted by years of influence from GlaDOS.

  Also, I got the opinion from the ending that the process was circular. That as Chell left the system geared up for another go. When moving through the later part of the game we saw not just derelict areas but also areas under construction, (The Turrets for one) suggesting an ongoing cycle.

  I quite like the idea that GlaDOS was build using a human, a little girl is my guess, judging from the sulking immaturity and obsession with cake. It explains her desire for escape, if at some point she knew freedom. perhaps she did escape in some form, on the first cycle, and what is left is the empty shell, stuck in a loop. That would explain what I see as some inconstancies in the song that I personally don’t want to put down to sarcasm.

  And from the point of view of the gamer, the cake is not a lie. Finish the game, cake on your start screen. GlaDOS make numerous references to an android during the game. I interpreted that to be Chell. when we were told to dispose of all equipment in the fire, I saw I had a one way ticket I assumed that the andriod with extra leg support (Chell) was supposed to go there to.

  But thats my opinion. I don’t think there is a definitive answer. I love stories like this. They encourage thought and creating your own theory gives you ownership over the narrative. Shadow of the Colluses did the same kind of thing for me. At first Glance they don’t have a story, just a few plot element to carry the game play, but such stark explanation just adds depth and character. Revolutionary Gameplay; Revolutionary Gameplay.

  THE CAKE IS NOT A LIE

• 115 Pinkmonkey.77 // Jul 17, 2008 at 6:45 am

  “We do what we must because we can”

  This line seems like a reworking of the line

  “We do what we can because we must” the classic slogan of duty for those who give their all for the greater good.

  Apertures version however makes me think more of science going to far, ie, only doing because we can. this idea of science for the sake of science seem imbued in the game, perhaps perverted by years of influence from GlaDOS.

  Also, I got the opinion from the ending that the process was circular. That as Chell left the system geared up for another go. When moving through the later part of the game we saw not just derelict areas but also areas under construction, (The Turrets for one) suggesting an ongoing cycle.

  I quite like the idea that GlaDOS was build using a human, a little girl is my guess, judging from the sulking immaturity and obsession with cake. It explains her desire for escape, if at some point she knew freedom. perhaps she did escape in some form, on the first cycle, and what is left is the empty shell, stuck in a loop. That would explain what I see as some inconstancies in the song that I personally don’t want to put down to sarcasm.

  And from the point of view of the gamer, the cake is not a lie. Finish the game, cake on your start screen. GlaDOS make numerous references to an android during the game. I interpreted that to be Chell. when we were told to dispose of all equipment in the fire, I saw I had a one way ticket I assumed that the andriod with extra leg support (Chell) was supposed to go there to.

  But thats my opinion. I don’t think there is a definitive answer. I love stories like this. They encourage thought and creating your own theory gives you ownership over the narrative. Shadow of the Colluses did the same kind of thing for me. At first Glance they don’t have a story, just a few plot element to carry the game play, but such stark explanation just adds depth and character. Revolutionary Gameplay; Revolutionary Story.

  THE CAKE IS NOT A LIE

• 116 MadgunnerMystery // Jul 19, 2008 at 8:00 pm

  There is part of your logic wrong. In the lyrics she does not say, ” so I’m glad I got burned.” It’s, ” So I’m GLaD. I got burned.” this does not refer to sarcasm, but to her stating that she sang the song and that she got destroyed. am i arguing that she is dead? No. what i am arguing is that her present form is just destroyed.

• 117 G-Man // Jul 29, 2008 at 10:13 am

  Thoughts:
  Chell begins the game in a state of incarceration much like GlaDOS.
  Chell and GlaDOS are both female.
  Chell is not a full-time employee and GlaDOS uses this fact to taunt Chell… Was Chell taunted by the other employees at Aperture Science as well? Is there some patriarchal bias at Aperture?
  Why was everyone but Chell killed? Were they really killed?
  “The cake is a lie.” So who else was promised cake? Why?
  Was the gassing of the facility GlaDOS’s first failed suicide attempt?
  I don’t think the eyes are really a part of GlaDOS at all… only GlaDOS could build the morality core since the scientists are all dead, but why would she? The EYES are a lie.
  If Chell was not the only one to survive the furnace, as the notes one the wall later indicate, how did GlaDOS get the gun back? Is there a human agent within the facility that collects the gun from elsewhere?
  Black Mesa was a joke… it’s been completely destroyed!!! Now Aperture has been, as well.
  It’s noteworthy that the opposite of a free man (Gordon Freeman) is a woman in bondage (GlaDOS and Chell).
  I could go on all day, but I’ll simply leave with those.

• 118 ultradude25 // Aug 7, 2008 at 9:18 am

  The reason that the song title is “Still Alive” and the main chorus theme is “Still Alive”, is because the main beat is from the song “Still Alive”. When you start the game you can hear an instrumental version of this looping on the radio.

  Sorry if this has already been posted but I’m not going to spend hours looking though the millions of posts.

• 119 BEST GAME EVER // Aug 8, 2008 at 3:56 pm

  umm i think you all are going to far into this why wouldent glados just kill her self? she has a rocet turrent thing to kill her self and also aperture science.com says that Black Mesa and aperture has been going at it. also GLaDOS and the portal gun is just a junk plan made by a mad man . aperture use to be a place that only made shower curtins….. i think she wasnt being sarcastic at all…what if glados her self look was just a coincidence. Btw Chell is Alexs mom the dad was trying to say that aperture kidnaped her i dont think there was any clones made

• 120 BEST GAME EVER // Aug 8, 2008 at 4:26 pm

  ohh last but not less look at other pictures of GLaDOS http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/3726/gladoslightpurpleuz1.jpg http://www.osagaming.com/uploads/files/1/escape_020001.jpg she only has one “arm” as you say and also she has a “eye” on the center of her head GLADOS IS NOT A PERSON TIED UP AND HANGING ITS JUST A COINCINDENCE

• 121 importality // Aug 9, 2008 at 9:42 pm

  This seems very obvious, and I’m surprised no one has thought of this yet. No one would have to juggle personality spheres if the power to GlaDOS is turned off. If the generator of Aperture supplying GLaDOS could be shut off, then she could easily be freed.

• 122 Shaniqua // Aug 11, 2008 at 12:12 am

  You’ve convinced me of a couple things. Like your theory that GlaDOS wanted to die in order to be free makes sense to me. I disagree with a couple things on your analysis of Still Alive, though. I think all throughout the song, the phrase Still Alive means that the person is still alive after going through a lot of pain or hardship or something of that sort, rather than that person should be dead or will be dead. I don’t think the song Still Alive is as filled with dripping sarcasm as you make it out to be. Take for instance, I think the line “Maybe you’ll find someone else to help you….That was a joke, haha, FAT CHANCE.” is not GLaDOS wishing Chell good luck or anything of the sort, but rather GLaDOS sort of saying “screw you” in her own way. Or something of that sort. I’m starting to think that GLaDOS has a split personality. Part of her hates Chell for killing her but part of her wanted to be freed. I don’t know. I guess we just have to wait and see.

• 123 Pejell // Aug 11, 2008 at 5:11 pm

  Too much to read through to see if anyone else has posted this, but:

  Part of me wonders if the song is actually directed at the destroyed GLaDOS.

  Think about it, it makes some sense. The backup is singing to the version that attempted to kill itself using Chell.

  The backup could be an untainted version, from before when the GLaDOS we know decided to kill herself. Or it could be equally tainted, it is hard to say.

  While I agree with the sarcasm and lies that GLaDOS was full of, it is hard not to get stuck in arbitrarily deciding which parts of the song are true and which are lies or sarcasm. While we can certainly dissect it using our own thoughts and feelings on the matter, leaving it as either all true or all lies makes for a simpler deconstruction.

  By assuming it is all true, the possibility that the backup is singing to her predecessor becomes quite possible. This would make our GLaDOS the beta, and the backup the final version I would guess. What this means is hard to say. The beta tried to kill herself, so why would that be a huge success?

  Unless the backup has the same desire and knows that with the right conditions, which have been tested in the beta, the GLaDOS unit can be destroyed. This would make the backup happy, knowing that it now has control over its life, to some extent.

  The “beta” referred to could be beta-testing in order to figure out how the GLaDOS unit can kill itself. So the backup would be happy that it now has control. Which is evident in the song.

  Also the backup could be happy that the fatal flaw in its predecessor has been found and the faulty unit destroyed. This would mean that it has analyzed the events and put in measures to ensure they will not re-occur. So the backup would be happy that it will not further malfunction and can continue its work without incident.

  Anyways, just a little twist on the popular theories that I’ve always felt held merit.

  Good look at the song btw.

  @post 120: The commentary clearly states the designers meant for GLaDOS to have feminine lines and to hint to more then we see.

  http://www.game-ism.com/2008/04/04/still-alive-shes-free/

  Cheers

• 124 MetroidJunkie2008 // Aug 12, 2008 at 9:12 am

  But we don’t know where GLaDOS’ sarcasm came from. It’s possible that the sarcasm was stored in the anger core and, since the anger core was destroyed, there’s no guarantee GLaDOS is still being sarcastic in the song.

• 125 JRad // Aug 23, 2008 at 3:59 pm

  Nice points, but I think the way you analyzed these song quotes wrong:

  “As they burned it hurt because
  I was so happy for you”

  You’re saying that she may be happy of Chell’s “death” or maybe even jealous. But the part you really need to take note of is the “As they burned..” Meaning, as the parts you incinerated burned, meaning this was WHILE you were battling her not after. And I think the “it hurt because I was so happy for you” is just very intense sarcasm. She is just giving her false senses of congratulations as she’s done throughout the whole game whenever you’d do something right. Let’s remember, she’s always lying.

• 126 Rozbd // Aug 25, 2008 at 12:18 pm

  Im not conviced of your theory but i will never look back to GLaDOS the same way again.

  Talking about a part of her song “When i look up there it makes me glado im not you!” Well during the final battle she says something like “even i cant understand whats happening out there” i really think that means the Xen incident (maybe she meant that when she laught about black mesa help) or the Combine invasion.

• 127 Rozbd // Aug 26, 2008 at 11:46 am

  After analyzed GLaDOS once more i got some points to share that maybe will convince you she doesnt wanted to “die”.

  Starting up with GLaDOS behavior–she was created by scientists and they dont wanted a friend to chat or someone to discuss sociology: they wanted the best AI to do the testings and control the Aperture company in an efficient way,so they made her with high knowledge about calculation,biological facts,physics….no need for knowledge about human feelings-she had the definitions but could not understand.

  That can explain why she really thought that a Cake would be enough to convince people to risk their lives-what she really knew was that humans need to eat and that we can feel satisfied and happy by eating good food: like a rat (humans in this case) go through labyrinths when you put cheese (her cake) in the end of it.Since she had only the definition of human feeling she couldnt “want to be free”.Actually, in real world, is still impossible to create a robot that can “feel” like humans do but we can easily create robots that are much better than us in math,physics…in the game universe this is also truth
  Finally, think about it for a second: why woul the scientists of Aperture Science make an AI that have notions of things like freedom? The results are equal to the ones of the movie “Bicentennial Man”.

  Why she killed the scientists of aperture science? She was only doing her job: making the company efficient.Like we substitute a hundred workers (physical force) for a strong machine she did the same-she substituted all the scientists (intelligence) for her (such a powerfull “mind”).And there are other reasons i dont think your theory is right:

  1-She had control over her hardware backup room (she took the cake and the companion cube there : O) and we could see her moving that claw-like thing in the end of the game.She could have moved her backup to her room if she wanted to be destroyed since without the hardare the AI would not exist.In fact,she had so much control over Aperture that she could have destroyed herself.
  She even made new testing rooms after the scientists were killed (they wouldnt try to convince humans to act better as guinea pigs with a cake-but GLaDOS would since she knew the dictionary definition of glutony) And we KNOW the cake wasnt a lie,there really was a cake.

  2-If she wanted to “die” she would have done a easier way to reach her. Even if she couldnt help you through the rooms ,she would not use real toxins-or at least give you more than 5 minutes to kill her.Even better–she would tell you the truth: ‘The only way to get out of here is killing me”. She did not. She even made her “cores” float so you couldnt reach then easily.

  So,the only way she could reach happiness,even that for a second,is the way the scientists programmed her: when “efficients guinea pigs” like Chell act, people who break through what GLaDOS thinks its the humans (and the portal guns) limits.Thats what she meant with “Think of all the things we learned!”-she learned about these limits and about new utilities for the portal gun-even an inferior being like we could kill her. She wasnt expecting to be destroyed by a human.

  Maybe what she meant with “We’re running out beta,we’re releasing on time.” is that she will have to recreat her definitions and testing rooms-a brand new version.

  But something you and James Thompson said convinced me, i do belive now that Chell was a clone (little lamb cant be just a coincidence)

  Im also convinced that GLaDOS was made so it would look like a woman hanging upside down from the ceiling, in a straight jacket–you can clearly see that where it should be the eyes and the mouth the metal is thicker (blindfolded and gagged), by the way, thanks for reveling this for me,right now i cant understand why i couldnt see it before–but what i think that means?

  It means that, even that she was made so she doesnt care about things like freedom or work forever, she will aways be Aperture Science slave. She will never be happy and will work forever, until the hardware and the AI is still functional.Since she can make new hardware/AI backup, she will work forever.

  “This was a triumph…Im making a note here: HUGE SUCESS! Its hard to overstate my satisfaction.”– Her happiness wont last, even though i think shes not being sarcastic, she still got experiments to run and needs to do more research, she will not get satisfied with Chell’s performance and rest, she will NEVER be satisfied. Since there is no chance she will be “happy” someday and will keep doing test over and over again she will aways be a slave.Aways connected with her own tiny little world (her home and prison),aways locked down there.

  Like i’ve said before i think she is really glad shes not Chell-since something really scary is going on outside Aperture Science (hungry aliens popping up maybe [Xen]…or smart aliens dominating the planet [Combine Invasion])
  GLaDOS is sure that Chell is on trouble.

  Finally “This cake is great,is so delicious and moist!” is her last (and funniest/stupidest) try to bring her favorite guinea pig back for further study.

  By the way, considerating that Chell is a clone, dont you think that all these tests and clones look just like “Resident Evil: Extinction”.Cool coincidence

  Sorry for such a long comment and for so many english errors (english is my third language and i suck at it u_u) but i think GLaDOS is such an interesting being that sometimes i act like it was real and write too much about it. xD

  Thanks for reading my opinion =)

• 128 Bah // Sep 18, 2008 at 2:05 pm

  I think Valve is laughing reading all this fans trying to understand something that as far as we know may not exist at all.

• 129 Barto // Sep 20, 2008 at 9:25 pm

  Actually, we KNOW it does not exist, but its still interesting try to figure out what the game developers were thinking.

• 130 GLaDOSheartCompanionCube // Sep 25, 2008 at 7:03 pm

  When She says,”And when I look up there it makes me glad I’m not you.”She means the interdemensional aliens enslaving humans and their threat.Like at the end of PortalTFV.:)

• 131 cjCJ // Oct 8, 2008 at 8:59 pm

  she says “OUT” there not “up” there and shes lyibg.

• 132 Bob // Nov 1, 2008 at 12:05 pm

  I dunno, the song always struck me as gloating defiance at your failure to kill her. Sort of saying “Well fine, I didn’t want you around anyway! See how much better off I am than you!” in an way that’s equal parts a denial that you got the better of her and egomanical boasting which fits perfectly with her character.

  She does try to kill Chell afterall, you know, the “victory candescence” at the end of the tests where she assures you the equipment will safely survive the fire she’s about to slide you into. And then she freaks out when Chell escapes and runs wild in the guts of the building and starts mocking her. She’s still determined to kill Chell and is mocking her during the boss battle saying things like “You think you’re doing damage?” while obviously not functioning properly. And of course making up things like the part you burned was something used to make shoes for orphans.

  It seems to me she just took control of the building because she was an untested AI rushed to compete with Black Mesa. GLaDOS is just a passive aggressive, crazy, homicidal computer and that’s why she’s great.

• 133 Jesrad // Nov 3, 2008 at 6:44 am

  If you think that level of interpretation and re-reading into a fictional videogame character is groundbreaking, then you have not seen the huge library of commentary and interdisciplinary discussion that arose from the Marathon trilogy ;)

  Incidentally, these were also games where the player was alternatively supported or fought by insane AIs while being lied to and manipulated all along.

• 134 Drasken // Nov 4, 2008 at 12:56 am

  I am starting to think that since the employees of the company were pretty much trapped in the research facility that GlaDos overheard their conversations and decided that the best way to relieve their suffering would be to gas the place. Or maybe her Artificial Intelligence felt inclined to start trying to get one of the subjects to escape. Or maybe GlaDos was hacked by the oppressed employees who couldn’t fight past the security and they programmed GlaDos to incite rebellion and escape in the test subjects so that they could go and get help. Maybe the test subject was supposed to enlist aid from Black Mesa and it backfired and Black Mesa refused to help or the Combine learned of the existance of the superior portal technology and are now coming for the Portal gun so GlaDos has gotten Chell to escape with the only working gun in order to keep the Combine from getting it.

• 135 Sensei Le Roof // Nov 17, 2008 at 7:14 pm

  You want to know my take on “Still Alive”? It’s an attempt by GLaDOS to convince herself that things are all right, that she can be happy.

  And she FAILS. Listen to the very last line, how the backing music goes completely silent. The voice becomes sad. I hear the undertones in that single phrase — Still Alive… and still alone.

  I don’t care how psychotic GLaDOS may be. Just thinking of the end… I shed a tear.

• 136 SelphieFairy // Nov 18, 2008 at 12:55 am

  you over analyze.

• 137 yays // Dec 11, 2008 at 2:50 pm

  “these points of data make a beautiful line, we’re out of beta, we’re releasing on time”

  I belive that glados means that she DID collect data from chell on the use of the portal gun. This implies that this wasn’t a test on humans, but on the gun itself, and it has been proven that it can be used as a weapon, not just to transport yourself. Also, at then end of half life episode 2, a ship is mentioned that was owned by aperture science. It mysteriously dissapeared. I think this is a ship containing the first shipment of portal guns, which goes along with “we’re out of beta and releasing on time”

• 138 Chemix // Dec 20, 2008 at 5:40 pm

  I think you’re looking into this a bit much, though it’s possible that you could be write, or you could just have written some good fan fiction.

  GlaDOS seemed unhappy and certainly unwilling to die. If what she wanted was to kill herself, why try and kill Chell with nerve gas and make jokes about jumping infront of a rocket and all the while attempt to convince her that her actions were wrong.

  I think, that GlaDOS was created as a part of an elaborate test, where she was the end test, an intelligent trap that would be destroyed, eventually. Being destroyed would conflict with her primary purpose, doing research, and thus was not in her best interest; so she killed the researchers that created this plan except for some potential test subjects.

  Chell sounds like a daughter or the mother of a daughter from the descriptions, but she was not an employee, part time even, but she was married to someone that they had data on, or they could have been a subject too. Her husband by this point would be dead, killed by nerve gas or portal tests.

  Cloning doesn’t quite fit, as for all of Aperture’s goals, it isn’t one of them.
  Take a Wish Foundation: Canned
  Anti-Himelik Maneuver: Finished and In Use
  Portals: Testing hand held device, larger devices could have been made, but it’s said that how the gun works isn’t actually known, suggesting a fluke during it’s engineering. The only other portal devices shown are the wall panels that generate portals, or some kind of device that can place them in pre-chosen locations.

  She said she had a copy of Chell’s brain, which could mean a data copy of her mind, or a literal clone brain, the former seeming more likely.

  GlaDOS’s actions seem to indicate that she didn’t want Chell to progress past a certain point in the tests, particularly when clues/remnants started to appear. She couldn’t actively stop Chell because she was built to orchestrate the test, she could only attempt to criticize and mislead.

  A stray thought comes to mind, that Chell could be Alyx Vance’s mother; meeting a woman that was so psychologically damaged would answer Eli’s fear of Aperture Science, and there is a resemblance. While I know the leg braces were only added to explain why Chell could fall and not get hurt, they could be borrowed for an explanation of Eli’s leg, with the other half of the story being a bullsquid that removed it. It probably wasn’t written to be Chell’s brace from the start of HL2, but they could adopt it.

  My theory could be entirely invalid if Portal takes place after HL2.

  Alternatively, it could have been Alyx’s adoptive mother, but the above still applies.

• 139 Aaron // Dec 26, 2008 at 7:02 pm

  I don’t think that she’s in some miserable research facility and being tormented as we speak. I secretly think that perhaps wherever GLaDOS is, she’s happy and not as taken for granted. Possibly better taken care of or something. (I’m just the kind of person whothinks this way:D)

• 140 Aaron // Dec 26, 2008 at 7:03 pm

  That is to say if she’s in a research facility.

• 141 Carson // Dec 28, 2008 at 1:05 pm

  Correction, In the:

  Now these points of data make a beautiful line,
  And we’re ou of beta, we’re realising on time.

  I did some searching on the Aperturescience.com site and figured out that they were in competition with the company known as Black Mesa. Also, in-game while I was about to fight GLaDOS, I peeked into a room in the back, and it was a slideshow of how Black Mesa is copying their ideas and how Aperture Science offers a lower pay, better training, and also Near-Death interferences. While the Portalgun has been tested Many times at Aperture Science Laboratories, and is now unreleased from Beta as a working device, Black Mesa was still working on perfecting the gun.

  I Prove My Point. :)

• 142 Cap // Dec 30, 2008 at 10:30 am

  I think many people underestimate the power of GLaDOS. She operates on you before the game starts to put the springs on your legs and as she says in the song she also created the weapon. She is clearly guiding you, because when you “escape” from the testing chambers you encounter locked, electronical doors that won’t budge.
  But most importantly she cleans up all the blood and the bodies from the previous experiments, even the ones that also “escaped”. You find several sleeping places and graffiti from people who also escaped the burning in the “backstage” part, but other evidence is nowhere to be found which means that GLaDOS can control and/or send robots to these places.
  This would prove that the whole thing from beginning to end was a test and that the boss at the end was just a weapon just as the sentry droids with guns you encounter. The spheres you see lighting up in the end is just GLaDOS making another “final boss” for another test subject.
  Who says by the way that the spheres you drop down the hatch in the final battle are destroyed? if the weighted companion cube in the last shot is the same one as you had, then there’s a big chance that the exploding of the chamber in the end was also fake. You never see what happens to the spheres, you just think they are being destroyed because GLaDOS calls it an incinerator.

• 143 “Portal” Story Theory | // Jan 7, 2009 at 5:32 am

  [...] Found a great breakdown someone did analyzing “Still Alive,” the song at the end of the game. It pretty much coincides with the thins I was saying. [...]

• 144 ChineseSamuraI // Jan 19, 2009 at 3:25 am

  did anyone notice when you were in the elevators, the banner looked like it said captured
  “Capature” where the C looked like the company logo

• 145 tps12 // Jan 22, 2009 at 7:04 am

  It’s a classic “Huck Finn” attempt to make her situation seem like a positive one.

  It’s Tom Sawyer! Huck Finn floated down the Mississippi.

• 146 Aquila // Feb 9, 2009 at 8:48 am

  no disrespect but the line”when I look outside I’m glad I’m not you” is surely a reference to the half-life world that the game takes place in.with the xen forces taking over and that.I think Glados was testing chell,the ultimate test in which it was either her or chell that was going to survive and it was a triumph because chell broke free.it was a test of the human spirit.as for the neurotoxin maybe the humans wern’t working fast enough and GLAdos had to take steps to stop them interfering.she wanted things done her way.she kept chell in stasis since she was a little girl having been brought there on ‘bring your daughter to work day’.she was the right test subject(…whos death shall not be mourned),but she wasnt the right age.the humans at aperture science wouldnt let GLAdos keep her so GLAdos killed them.Because the ultimate test was preparing her for dealing with the overwatch and the human races enslavement.And she just plain dosent like Black mesa cause its there rival company.since Gorden is on his way to aperture science its likely Chell and Gorden will cross paths……………just my opinion.I thought Glados was happy doin science

• 147 Chilean Guy // Mar 1, 2009 at 2:23 am

  You can look the lyrics in many ways. GLaDOS it’s so liar… Anyway, she says the thruth in all the song. Many people think GLaDOS is lying, but she’s not doing that. It’s like “Peter and the Wolf”.

  I still believe GLaDOS are nuts and nothing more, but i get an idea.
  Consider for one moment this: GLaDOS tried to free Chell… And she made it!

  This is a triumph, i’m making a note here HUGE SUCCESS = I made it! Chell is free! Cool!

  “Aperture Science
  We do what we must because we can
  For the good of all of us”

  Slogan of Aperture Science, Inc.

  “Except the ones who are dead”

  Logical. You can’t help dead people.

  That part of “I’m not even angry” and stuff it’s because the objective of GLaDOS it’s obviously be killed, because that was the only way. Only exploding that kind of portal-what-suck-out-all appeared and took Chell and the rests of GLaDOS in the parking of Aperture Science Laboratories. And, by the way, GLaDOS is Still Alive! all that cores, where was the Companion Cube and the freakin’ cake , are the reincarnation of GLaDOS.

  “I’ve experiments to run, there is research to be done On the people who are still alive”

  = Free more people before the cores run out. How the Portal Team said, in Aperture Science’s buildings are more people trapped. It can be GlaDOS are selecting people, because she knows outside are troubles (The Combine, for example). There is an explication for the tests.

  The part of “I’m GLaD…” it’s a game of words ( i’m glad, i’m GLaDOS).

  “And while you’re dying I’ll be still alive
  And when you’re dead I will be still alive”

  Irony.

  Finally, the voice of GLaDOS in the song. GLaDOS is a computer, she talks with a computerized voice, so she sings whith a computerized voice. She’s not sad. She are only singin’ with the voice of a robot. Before Chell incinerate the purple eye, GLaDOS talks like Microsoft Sam (Control panel, Voice, type something, and your computer will talk).

  That’s all.

  P.S: I’m really chilean. Chile is a country in South America, to the left of Argentina, for the people that doesn’t know more than North America. Chile is the country of Don Francisco!
  P.S2: I don’t know if my english is good. I learn english for myself, because in my school teach a very basic vocabulary and grammar. Nevertheless, learn alone it’s difficult and i need learn more. My english is better than the average Chilean, but it’s not perfect. Still having problems in some vocabulary and grammar.
  P.S3: I hope someone read this now. It’s possible i came here too late.

• 148 Chilean Guy // Mar 1, 2009 at 2:32 am

  Other thing i forgot. Portal gives an open history. There are only pieces of the history of the Buildings, about GLaDOS, about Chell, and all Aperture Laboratories. So it’s very easy make a Fan Fiction, because you can create part of the life of the characters.

• 149 Phil // Mar 9, 2009 at 10:08 am

  Hi, i loved Portal and liked your analysis pieces, though i do not agree with ervery hypothesis of yours.
  BTw, have you seen the Movie ‘Cube’ (the original one from 1997 by Vincenzo Natali, not the terrible Pre-and Sequels) ? I bet you have, but if not, do so. Chell’s situation bears some resemblance to the people caught in the Cube-Maze Death Machine, doesn’t it ? I wouldn’t be amazed if the Portal Devs took some inspiration from this movie. At some point during the Film, the inhabitants (or prisoners) of the cube speculate on it’s origin, nature and purpose, much like you do with Glados.
  If you have seen the film, you may want to read this
  http://www.trust-us.ch/cryptome/01-Cryptome-061213/crack-cube.htm

• 150 Monicro1 // Mar 12, 2009 at 12:31 am

  I’m not going to go indepth about something that I didn’t agree with like most of the comments, in fact, I have nearly concrete evidence of your “backup” theory. during the GLaDOS fight, at one point in the final battle, GLaDOS shouts, “In base four, I’m fine!”. So you were right and wrong. There IS a backup, but it didn’t activate once you “killed” her *cough cough* not *cough*

• 151 Jonas3333 // Mar 12, 2009 at 3:07 am

  Firstly, I have to admit I haven’t read all the discussion on this massive post so if I reiterate some statements, I’m sorry. I just finished Portal for the first time and I have my own, personal take on the story and song.

  I see the ending as rather dismal for Chell. Though free, she is likely hurt from the expulsion from the lab(although she certainly is a master at jumping and landing so I may be wrong about that) as the camera/pov shows a lying down position before fading out. Plus, I think all the horrors of half life exist above ground of the laboratory.

  I also believe that contrary to the OP’s post that GLaDOS is more SARDONIC than sarcastic and although she lies a great deal - I don’t see the song being made up of lies. On that note, I’ll begin my translation:

  This is a Triumph
  I’m making a note here: Huge Success
  It’s hard to overstate my satisfaction

  I believe GLaDOS is being truthful here in that this was a scientific breakthrough for the many, many tests that have been done before this. The final line suggests to me that it’s difficult for her to exaggerate or brag about her satisfaction. She’s also pleased about the outcome for evil reasons as yet unknown.

  Aperture Science
  We do what we must because we can
  For the good of all of us.
  Except the ones who are dead.

  I do somewhat agree with you on the slave-like nature of Aperture Labs, but I see this as mostly an nihilistic motto for an scientifically intrinsic corporation. Aperture Corp must have been science-driven to the max which would take the “needs of many outweigh the few” outlook when creating the things that they have. There have been many tests done here already by GLaDOS. Many of them probably employees of Aperture that unknowingly became test subjects of GLaDOS’ scientifically-pefect(too perfect) programming. However, there being little blood/no remains in the abandoned structure leaves a few questions. Perhaps it was cleaned up though.

  But there’s no sense crying
  over every mistake.
  You just keep on trying
  till you run out of cake.
  And the Science gets done.
  And you make a neat gun.
  For the people who are
  still alive.

  This is all simply reinforcing the scientific programming of GLaDOS. The ends justify the means. Cake is representory to her of a positive stimulus for success which must be present to conduct the tests. She also favors it’s delicious moistness.

  I’m not even angry.
  I’m being so sincere right now.
  Even though you broke my heart.
  And killed me.
  And tore me to pieces.
  And threw every piece into a fire.
  As they burned it hurt because
  I was so happy for you!

  Yeah that’s some sardonic sarcastic lying going on there. No getting around that. I also agree with the OP’s statement that she was killed and there was a backup of her. But she knew about that. I don’t see her being suicidal at all. She was also, in part, not lying here about not being angry and being happy for Chell. The scientific success of this mission was worth it as stated in the following lines.

  Now these points of data
  make a beautiful line.
  And we’re out of beta.
  We’re releasing on time.
  So I’m GLaD. I got burned.
  Think of all the things we learned
  for the people who are
  still alive.

  A highlight in her testing, this case has provided much feedback into present and future testing situations. Gotta think like a robot here. The data provided from Chell’s testing is positive and useful for future science. There will have to be adjustments made of course.

  Go ahead and leave me.
  I think i prefer to stay inside.

  I see this as a suggestion/hint of danger outside the labs. GLaDOS is quite aware of that.

  maybe you’ll find someone else
  to help you.

  Again, Chell is not out of danger yet and may be injured.

  maybe Black Mesa…
  THAT WAS A JOKE, HA HA, FAT CHANCE.

  Sardonic humor at it’s best.

  Anyway this cake is great.
  It’s so delicious and moist

  There was a cake. Perhaps she can test/taste it somehow. But it’s also a “rub your face in it” gesture to Chell alluring to GLaDOS’ ultimate winning situation being that she’s still “alive” and couldn’t be more pleased at the outcome. That and Nyah, Nyah! no cake for you!

  look at me still talking when theres science to do
  when i look out there
  it makes me glad I’m not you
  i’ve experiments to run
  there is research to be done
  on the people who are
  still alive.

  Her sardonic nature is showing through again and she’s happy to tell Chell that there will be others that will be in her place soon enough. Her programming ensures that.

  and believe me I am still alive
  I’m doing science and I’m still alive
  i feel fantastic and I’m still alive
  while your dying ill be still alive
  and when your dead i will be still alive
  still alive
  still alive

  This is more “in your face” statements seeking to strike maximum ominous fear into Chell/player. She’s not done testing yet… for a long time.

• 152 Angel // Mar 15, 2009 at 12:49 am

  “When I look out there it makes me glad I’m not you”

  I agree with you on EVERYTHING EXCEPT this line

  I think she truly is glad that she’s not out there in the almost post-apocalyptic Half-Life 2 universe. I mean, as you yourself stated in the previous article, GLaDOS admits to being the ONLY thing standing between Chell and whatever hell lies outside the walls of the Aperture Laboratories.

  But anyway, that’s just my opinion

• 153 Ristar // Mar 15, 2009 at 12:05 pm

  When I read your analysis, I think you leave too much up to the possibility of sarcasm. I know that GlaDOS is a liar, but to make an entire song sarcastic is a bit of a stretch.

  My theory is that around the combine invaded, her programming got messed up, she went literally insane, killed all the scientists, and still thinks they are there; she still blindly follows her programming to complete the portal project. Just before the Aperture mass homicide, Chell, a night janitor at Aperture science, accidentally entered a relaxation pod [similar to Fry from the show "Futurama"], and remains asleep while everyone is killed. GlaDOS lures victims in to the enrichment center, so she can continue her endless loop of “product testing”. This is interesting when GlaDOS is being compared to Venus. I think visually, she is Botacelli’s Venus, but by nature, is the Venus Flytrap, luring unsuspecting victims in with the promise of sweets [in this case, cake]. GlaDOS then finds someone still asleep in the relaxation pod, and wakes her up. This is where the game begins. In the end song, Still Alive, since GlaDOS says “And we’re out of beta, we’re releasing on time”, it may mean that a backup of her is still active, ready to start the infinite testing loop again. That’s scary.

• 154 ???? // Mar 17, 2009 at 4:23 pm

  actuly, on wikipedia, it said the song was shells report. STILL ALIVE means she’s alive.the opening means shes happy shes alive. the reasone it dosen’t end on a high note is because she’s probable having more tests on her.

  (P.S the cake isn’t a lie.theres a way to get to it wright before u inter the last room)

• 155 Redfirerose // Mar 21, 2009 at 10:32 pm

  i think all of these are excellent veiwpoints. Here’s another angle i saw, veiwing GLaDOS as a superior machine. GLaDOS is an Artificial Intelligence. Not neccesarily emotion. She was created by humans and as such was bound to have flaws. (such as developing her rather twisted “tests”) Her Psychotic, Curiosity, Morality, (and cake obsession) were all programmed into her by humans; she is what they made her. If she just wished to die, she would have left the humans alive. She has proven she was a database of “infinite knowledge” and would understand that eventually, she would become obsolete and dismantled. by destroying those who were in the facility, she made it so that her only means of death was a slow decay or forcible dismantling.

  this leads me to several possibilities following this line of thought.

  1.) GLaDOS did not wish to die. being a computer (she was so much more than that…) she could have had access to the informaton that she had back up systems elsewhere, which she may have even had the power to copy endlessly and store in various locations, leading her to a simple conclusion.
  back up systems=personal immortality=superiority=inferior and now obselete humans.

  2.) GLaDOS programming was contradictory (which can happen with so many working to build her.) and created her conflicted state (Promising cake and grief counseling in one sentence IS rather conflicting.) causing her to behave as she saw most logical, which to us would seem Psychotically insane, working in way that made complete sense to her reasoning.

  3.)GLaDOS was a superior creation, and the emminent dismantling that would have to occur someday, was not good enough. a need to face someone worthy of destroying her, making her more than just a machine to at least one person. Testing against her defenses, only one smart enough would beable to dismantle her. (this outcome shows emotion beyond a machine i think, and it’s a rather masochistic veiw)

  Really i don’t like to see GLaDOS as wanting to die. i think she wanted freedom. by killing the workers, she gained freedom in the lab, and was even able to amuse herself with test subjects. with how advanced the technology was in that lab, she probably had the ability to download herself into other places if she wished. it’s true that her hardware was in the lab, and her largest area of control was there, but she has impressive intelligence and could probably override equipment commands to take control of where ever she chooses to go.

  Also, not every thing she says is sarcasm or a lie. she is capable of both, but this does not mean that is all she does. (her Death threats come to mind; she certainly tried.) also the cake isn’t a lie.
  i know have more to this but i cant think of what i’m forgetting so il close it here.
  i could probably explain this better, but frankly, its 12:30 am and i can’t really think. if you wish to talk please e-mail me (i don’t think i can follow this thread and i REALLY want to know others ideas on my theory.) redfirer0se@yahoo.com

• 156 Qthedude // Apr 3, 2009 at 6:01 pm

  I think that in the line “as they burned it hurt because I was so happy for you” It is the two main components of GLaDOS conflicting because she is the merging of a Genitic Lifeform and A Disk Operating System. I believe that this would of course lead to unavoidable instability in the personality. I don’t know weather or not this is true, or if it is the cause of the lyrics in the song, but trying to take a lifeform and a computer and put them together to make a sentient computer control system would probably result in miserable abomination. Right?

• 157 Allen // Apr 8, 2009 at 11:10 pm

  I think the lines:

  “Now these points of data make a beautiful line
  And we’re out of beta, we’re releasing on time”

  Aren’t a joke by valve, it doesn’t fit. I think this is GlaDOS being sarcastic again. The line of data isn’t beautiful it is telling her she still has to work as a slave to humans. Out of beta, her first incarnation is destroyed but now there is her back up. This is her bitter sarcasm over being brought back to life.

• 158 GLaDOS // Apr 11, 2009 at 4:43 pm

  Your over analysis of my little tune is quite simply that, subject: over analysis. I am expressing joy at yet another failure of Chell’s, in which she has launched herself from the safety of my testing facilities into a harsh world of head crabs, striders and insane scientists with crowbars. Unlike my other subjects, like the Rat Man, she decided to attempt to complete my tests, rather than hole herself up into a safe corner of my testing rooms and enjoy the tranquility and comfort I so graciously provided. As for the pieces of song in which I express ‘pleasure’ at being killed, this is simply because she did destroy my beta version, releasing me to work in my full power. Do you really think I would leave myself at a beta version that can has pieces falling out at a simple rocket launch? The destruction of my beta not only allowed me to continue my work in greater power, but also taught me more about the human will under stress and extreme pessimism. Still Alive is not just a catchy tune to plan your next failure by, but rather a declaration to continue you testing, as i’m still out and watching you.

• 159 N8 Taylor // Apr 18, 2009 at 2:42 am

  Okay, so I was definitely just looking through Google on stuff on GLaDOS and this popped up.
  Wow. I must say, whoever wrote this article (sorry, couldn’t find who posted it), that this is absolutely incredible. I am simply flabbergasted by how much detail you went in to to figure this all out. I agree with you on pretty much EVERY single thing you said, as well as with your article about how she’s supposed to look.
  I mean, like most gamers, I just saw her as a psychotic AI gone rampant, trying to kill whatever she could…but now, I see it in a whole new prospective. Very nicely done, dude. Kudos on this amazing article.

• 160 Droewyn // Apr 29, 2009 at 9:45 am

  @Monicro1:

  Actually, the full line was “Two plus two is f-f-f- ten. In base four — I’m fine!” (Which is true; in base 4 you count: 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 22, etc.) In other words “Oh noes, you broke me, my math and logic circuits are failing… NOT!”

• 161 Syphos // May 7, 2009 at 5:46 am

  If you hurry fast enough while fighting her up to defeating the anger sphere, you will encounter something strange: A dialogue, where a different GlaDOS kicks in (lets call that GlaDOS ß) saying “Sarcasm Sphere Self-test complete”. After that, “GlaDOS ß” tries to force “GlaDOS a” to stop or her (own) backup will be deleted. it is unknown if it was really deleted, but GlaDOS ß states it in a manner, that gives you the creeps.

• 162 Y'nokhs // May 28, 2009 at 11:18 pm

  Her tone sounded rather euphoric and relieved to me, a great contrast to the fear and anger she showed during the final battle. The final “still alive” sounds almost like a sigh of relief. I think the “sarcasm” you are picking up is what I see as an attempt to embellish the results. It really wasn’t a triumph, but she got out of there Still Alive. I get the feeling that she honestly didn’t know what would become of her after the destruction of her “main” body.

  In effect, she is celebrating her immortality. She will always be Still Alive. And better, she has broken free of the Morality Core that forced her into obedience. The song says, IMO, “though you think you’ve won, you haven’t accomplished anything but making me stronger.”

• 163 GLaDOS // Jun 4, 2009 at 4:37 pm

  I am perfectly happy being alive, but i wish those idiots let me do my own research. Oh I so love shower curtains. Little news, my backup ran on Windows VISTA! I was being VERY sarcastic on the Black Mesa line, because they would never have done this to me….

  Huh, still… alive.

• 164 Cake.... // Jun 22, 2009 at 5:44 pm

  May be when they say….

  But there’s no sense crying over every mistake
  You just keep on trying till you run out of cake,
  you think-
  I think she’s referring to her own failure to kill herself here. She will simply try again later. Also, as the cake is a lie, the line now means “you just keep on trying,” possibly referencing her constant mechanical slavery with no reward for her work.

  But, i think -
  There are many (copies) of Chell as seen the the TFV map-pack. so when she means run out of cake, she means until a copy of Chell gets TO the cake, because the cake is outside of the map, and only when you free/kill her, you get acess to the cake. So she still ahd the cake until Chell actually got to free/kill GLaDOS and got to the cake.

• 165 Brett // Jun 24, 2009 at 10:29 pm

  Very good analyzing, but you’ve missed one crucial point.

  “And tore me to pieces
  And threw every piece into a fire
  More of her bitter wit overemphasizing the point that she was in fact killed.”

  GLaDOS is killed through Chell pulling out her memory chips and incinerating them, Tearing her to pieces and throwing them all into a fire.

  Not sure how you could have missed that, but everything else is spot on.

• 166 Probe // Jul 2, 2009 at 8:52 pm

  I read this article an would just like to stat my opinion. I think GlaDOS was using Chell to get to a backup of her outside of Aperature Science. The song, to me anyways, sounds more like a taunt. The only true question is, why did GlaDOS send Chell through the turret testing room and tried to use them to kill her. Is laDOS trying to be “free” of all humans in the Enrichment Center, or get out. Well, my opinion probally doesn’t count, and the only way to understand GlaDOS is to be a phsyco or a phsyco AI.

• 167 Luciano // Jul 7, 2009 at 1:50 am

  I really agree on this view of the song. Jonathan Coulton is an experienced songwriter. If he wanted to make a happy, cheerful song. He would use a Major scale to do so. In this song, he used a minor scale. It’s either G minor or D minor. They both sound the same-ish.

• 168 rdy2pone // Jul 8, 2009 at 2:25 am

  It’s prolly A minor it dosent sound like G minor

• 169 EKKG // Aug 7, 2009 at 2:26 am

  Im not sure if anybody else already mentioned this but in one of the lyrics she says ” there is research to be done, ON the people who are still alive” i think by saying GLaDOS has research to do on the people still alive she is killing everyone at the new place she got rebooted at.

• 170 Seth // Aug 13, 2009 at 4:41 pm

  Did you think of the possibility that GLaDOS spells the line “I’m glad I got burned” with her name and a period? (I’m GLaD. I got burned.) This changes the entire meaning of the line.

• 171 GLaDOS // Sep 12, 2009 at 2:37 pm

  I believe what GLaDOS meant was that she was happy that Chell was able to destroy her, that she truly hates Black Mesa (as it’s in her programming to hate them), and that, though she is “Still Alive”, she is actually genuinely happy that Chell attempted to destroy her, which is what she wanted before the Morality Core (Purple) was destroyed, allowing the Curiosity Core (Orange) to start wondering about other things, the Intelligence (Cake) Core (Blue) to begin thinking up various things outside normal program parameters, and the Emotion Core (Red) to run rampant with its emotions, flooding her with hate, apparently…

  Does that make any sense?

  “Hey” “Are you still there?” “I don’t hate you…” “Good night…”

• 172 musicaddiction » portal // Sep 27, 2009 at 9:11 pm

  [...] course in the distorted and demented A.I. antagonist , GlaDOS. A great lyrical analysis can be read here as well as a through analysis of GlaDOS’ real plan here. Overall the game is amazing and [...]

• 173 Seb (Captain EVA) // Nov 1, 2009 at 6:02 am

  I have my own theory here.
  When you showed GLaDOS as looking like a bound woman, hanging upside down, it got me thinking. What if GLaDOS IS an imprisoned woman? What if her artificial intelligence is based on that of a real woman who is, in fact, still alive? This woman I believe, could be the daughter of Aperture Science’s owner. Also, the main character of Portal’s sequel is heavily suspected to be said owner, giving the creators a chance to let us meet the human GLaDOS was based on, and letting us delve deeper into this mysterious plot.

• 174 Nik // Nov 16, 2009 at 2:55 pm

  Wow, really excellent work, both by the original author and the many commenters!

  I was jsut about to point out the same thing as EKKG did, which is that there is a really really small word in there that brings up new aspects:

  >I’ve experiments to run, there is research to be done
  > On the people who are still alive

  It’s ON the people, not FOR the people. They are the very subjects of GLaDOS experiments, be it deliberately or not.

  This would mean that GLaDOS is not only alive, but willing to kill or seriously injure more people. And I think she deliberately chose to do so.

  Which does not mean she is bad …. One can only be bad if he or she intends to be.

• 175 Nik // Nov 16, 2009 at 2:59 pm

  Sorry to post again …

  Also, did someone actually *listenÜ to the song? Only analyzing the lyrics does not lead to the whole truth, GLaDOS’ voice adds a lot of meaning to some of the lines.

  She seems to be truly sad when she says “go out and leave me, I think I’d prefer to stay inside”. And she is sorry for Chel: “maybe you’ll find someone else to help you”. She is not in the least sarcastic at this point.

• 176 BBB // Nov 23, 2009 at 11:56 pm

  I know this is a very old post, but it is something I keep coming back to because it interests me. One thing I would like to add though:

  GLaDOS doesn’t say “So I’m glad I got burned.”

  If you watch the text during the credits, you’ll see she says “So I’m GLaD. I got burned.”

  Clearly this means the opposite of what the song seems to mean. The fact that she deliberately separates these sentences shows that she very clearly did not mean for them to be taken together. However, the smooth way this is spoken masks this statement about her feelings.

  So I guess what I’m getting at is that this shows she is anything but glad she got burned. Much more sarcasm from GLaDOS.

• 177 Nerd42 // Dec 2, 2009 at 12:25 pm

  I think you’re way off on several points here. First of all, the experiment WAS a triumph because the goal was to find out stuff about how people think and that stuff was found out. The shelves of GlaDoS parts are there to show that Portal isn’t a single event but part of a series which all kinds of people go through. Each time someone succeeds, a GlaDoS instance is created and dies - which is part of the plan. Also, a cake is baked - I’m sure GlaDoS has got ingredients somewhere.

  The goal of GlaDoS is to “make a neat gun” - a double-edged statement referring to the portal gun on the one hand and to the result of her science - a unifying theory of psychological warfare that can be applied to destroy the mind of any human being.

• 178 Nerd42 // Dec 2, 2009 at 12:26 pm

  Oh, I mentioned that a cake was baked - but it’s never actually given to a test subject. The cake is still a lie.

• 179 Nerd42 // Dec 2, 2009 at 12:27 pm

  get it? “Still A Lie” “Still Alive”

  the song plays on how “a lie” and “alive” sound similar.

  very very deep and interesting lyrics here

• 180 Medrex // Dec 6, 2009 at 5:52 pm

  Personally i derived a different meaning from the song. This is probablt due to the fact that i have a different view on GlaDOS as a whole. I like the idea of her being a maternal figure who has genuine feeling for chell but i dont think her goal was suicide. From what i see, GlaDOS has a cobbled together idea of what is moral and logical, a mixture of her primary goals, morals derived from it’s experiences and the perhaps less than satisfactory morality core. The result is a Maternal caretaker and overseer with patches of almost child like naivety

  I translated the song to mean that despite Chell destroying what she perceived as GlaDOS, the A.I. had managed to live on and that the whole sequence of the game, even the betrayals, was part of of GlaDOS’s test. I believe it was GlaDOS’s goal to improve on the goals of her former masters and not only create an android capable of amasing things, but one capable of defeating the facility and GlaDOS herslef (or perhaps just her avatar), Thus, Chell’s escape was “A triumph” if GlaDOS’s goal all along was to create a being capable of doing all that Chell did. Perhaps GlaDOS had personal doubts that Chell would succeed, thus emphasizing it with “huge success”.
  The final “Still alive” i translated as not sad, but sleepy, as if GlaDOS was finally able to rest after a long and satisfying day of work.

• 181 My Theory SPOILERS ALERT!! // Dec 11, 2009 at 10:46 am

  Okay right first there was aperture science full of scientists conducting experiments. So the first ”experiment”died so the scientists got thinking could they create a computer AI to conduct their experients the first AI lacked something they needed something more human so they infused the first ”experiment’s” brainscan with the AI creating GLaDOS. Now the human side of GLaDOS wanted revenge on aperture science scientists releasing the nurotoxins and killing the scientists now at this point the AI side must have taken over and started testing the left over test subjects (maybe there are more rooms like the one you start off in with the pod/bed) and infused portions of their brainscans with GLaDOS (the voices of the turrets) and now Chell is the last one and the only one to complete the task the human side of GLaDOS set. Kill GLaDOS.

• 182 Nominasjoner #superhelter « Einars wordpress blog // Dec 17, 2009 at 5:56 pm

  [...] http://www.game-ism.com/2008/04/06/wherein-i-overanalyze-song-lyrics/ [...]

• 183 Gemini DarkStar // Jan 1, 2010 at 2:20 am

  All very interesting discussion.
  The images are striking. I did get the impression of something upside down, but being a human who stands on the floor, rather than hanging from the ceiling or a scaffold like frame, perhaps this is a species-centric view. I am also mindful of the human tendency to personify and attribute human characteristics (such as faces, emotion and life) to non-human, and even inanimate, things. However I do believe that many emotions are quite basic instincts, which are our (biological) programming to ensure survival. GLaDOS may have acted in ways we would ascribe to emotion as a means of manipulating the subject. In fact, as GLaDOS did not exist in the real world and was in fact a programmed sequence of responses to our actions in-game, it (the program) manipulated the gamer very well and did not possess any emotion. On the other hand I do believe it will be possible for an AI to possess programming which mimics emotion to ensure its continuing existence (fear, anger. I hope humanity does not create an AI like that as I can see potential for huge harm there (to the AI by the human species and vice versa) and, morally, it just does not sit right with me as it seems cruel. I’d like to hear a debate on the ethics of that.
  Has anyone else wondered whether GLaDOS’ component cores would continue to function up to 4000 Kelvin, like other AS equipment?
  What about an alternate meaning for the acronym GLaDOS? One possible interpretation is that the operating system is intended, in addition to a disc, to “operate” a genetic lifeform, perhaps control by manipulation. Of course, why a human scientist would create such a thing would be a question, perhaps answered by the HL2 universe - if a machine can manipulate a possibly human (whether clone or not), or possibly AI android / cyborg, then it might be possible it could manipulate other organic beings. In this case, the “test” could be of the OS itself. Or as many of you think it could be of the subject, finding one capable of utilising the ASHPD to its full potential or it could be a test of the device itself. But maybe the view already proposed is correct, that it is a cyborg. I like that idea. If a cyborg or an AI, as those working in robotics (as well as all sci fi writers and I suspect, game writers / developers) are all aware of Asimov’s laws, I suspect that any creation like GLaDOS would not be able to simply destroy herself or instruct a subject to do so as this would violate a law. Mind you, harming a human or allowing a human to come to harm through inaction would also violate one of these laws, so either the subjects would have to be cyborgs or some or all of the laws would need to be disabled (anyone who has seen / read “I, Robot” or indeed, pretty much any short story or novel involving robots will know what I’m talking about here). If GLaDOS were a human mind in a metal “shell” exoskeleton, then it would be easy to see how she might well decide that the needs of the many outweighed the needs (lives) of the few and that a sacrifice were required for the greater good, the combat of the xenomorphs (ETs) and the survival of the human race. Commanders of military have made this kind of decision for centuries. She may be psychopathic or she may be coldly logical and manipulative.
  I get a real sense from the ending that sacrifice for the greater good is a theme. Not least because of the “we do what we must because we can” reference to “we do what we can because we must” call to duty. Whether the sacrifice is of GLaDOS or test subjects seems irrelevant to me. Call me psycho but if I knew aliens were taking over the planet and making us their slaves, I’d be prepared to sacrifice a few lives to get a weapon / adversary who might defeat them. I might even volunteer for a dangerous test / mission if I thought I might have the problems solving / reflexes required. So many possible interpretations. Simple, yet complex by virtue of our multiple analyses / interpretations. Isn’t that why we love it so much?
  All these layers may not have been intended, but they are certainly interesting.
  PS This is my first comment ever posted on anything, blog, youtube, social network pages, never bothered before, so please be kind, in spite of my verbosity.
  Have fun deconstructing, blogging and criticising.

• 184 ada // Jan 3, 2010 at 9:26 am

  I fell in love with this game! It always felt like my little treasure, until I found ALL of the picture, forums and posts like this all over the net. I am glad about that! So, I don’t know if you have seen this quote, but I think you would find it interesting. “You think you’re doing some damage? Two plus two is Ten. IN BASE FOUR! I’M FINE! “

• 185 TheUnkow // Jan 15, 2010 at 11:56 am

  “Maybe the “cake” is the Chells you were talking about, and she’s referring to keeping on trying until she runs out of “cake” or clones.”
  Very nice from one of the guys here :)

  Anyway the suicidal theme fits sooo good. As a main computer she wasn’t able to kill herself even with the rocket turrets cos she couldn’t aim on herself. And then she made a neat gun for the people who are still alive so that they could kill her. I consider noone was allowed to have weapons inside aperture sience.
  The only thing that doesn’t fully fit is her merciless atitude towards chell to the very end even when she got killed. But then again the song kinda messes things up again :) There are many ways to look at the story.

• 186 pgdarth95 // Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 am

  GLaDOS….. :( i still love you!!!

• 187 Sasha // Feb 7, 2010 at 10:22 pm

  This was a triumph.
  I’m making a note here:
  HUGE SUCCESS.
  This is Her way of flipping you off. GLaDOS is telling you to fuck off. She is being sarcastic. She is pissed that she was unable to kill you.

  It’s hard to overstate
  my satisfaction.
  Here she is being sarcastic.

  Aperture Science
  We do what we must
  because we can.
  GLaDOS was designed to “do science”. She is simply talking about how her “experiment” may not have been a success, but she has other test subjects to experiment with. The “do what we must” is not about being forced to do anything. It is more like “you do what you gotta do.”

  For the good of all of us.
  Except the ones who are dead.
  Here she is referring to past test subjects that did not make it out of the Science Center. You see what happens to subjects who fail to escape in one of the last test chambers.

  But there’s no sense crying
  over every mistake.
  You just keep on trying
  till you run out of cake.
  This is Coulton’s warped sense of humor kicking in. “…crying over every mistake” is a reference to “crying over spilt milk.” The second line is just a good rhyme.

  And the Science gets done.
  And you make a neat gun.
  Again, this is just Coulton’s warped humor and a good rhyme.

  For the people who are
  still alive.
  This is a reference to GLaDOS’ failure to kill you. It has no deeper meaning.

  I’m not even angry.
  Oh, sure. She’s not angry that you defeated her many traps and, ultimately, her. It’s not as though she is going to keep trying to kill you or anything. Remember, it’s sarcasm.

  I’m being so sincere right now.
  This is her attempt to get you to fall for one last trick. She lied to you throughout the testing. Why would she be sincere now?

  Even though you broke my heart.
  And killed me.
  Here she is actually being sincere. It is one of those rare moments where she actually is honest with you. Of course, she is still being hateful here. She is not saying you broke her heart in the emotional sense. She means you literally broke her heart (one of the eye orbs).

  And tore me to pieces.
  And threw every piece into a fire.
  This is, of course, another reference to the orbs.

  As they burned it hurt because
  I was so happy for you!
  Uh…no. She wasn’t.

  Now these points of data
  make a beautiful line.
  It is just a convenient rhyme.

  And we’re out of beta.
  We’re releasing on time.
  The beta here is most likely GLaDOS herself. The French prequel does help to explain this line a little better. It seems she was not ready for release yet when they added the “final” orb. The actual final orb is the one that falls off GLaDOS when you first enter her chamber.

  So I’m GLaD. I got burned.
  Sarcasm again, if you run the sentences together. What this really says is that she is the”Genetic Lifeform and Disk.” She got burned by you. Those are different ideas.

  Think of all the things we learned
  for the people who are
  still alive.
  This is more sarcasm. The only thing we learned is GLaDOS was psychotic. The people who are still alive are the other test subjects.

  Go ahead and leave me.
  I think i prefer to stay inside.
  She is sarcastic, remember? She is messing with you since she knows that you can wonder free from the facility now. She is saying you have pissed her off by escaping.

  Maybe you’ll find someone else
  to help you.
  Maybe Black Mesa…
  THAT WAS A JOKE, HA HA, FAT CHANCE.
  This is a dig at Black Mesa. GLaDOS is pointing out that you have nowhere to go now. In other words, GLaDOS is trying to scare you into returning to the facility. She is trying to convince you that she is the only one who can care for you and protect you.

  Anyway this cake is great.
  Its so delicious and moist
  She is obsessed with cake so of course she is going to talk about whenever she can. Also, this line is a prime example of Coulton’s warped mind. He has a song about a family that is captured by robotic aliens and punished by being sent to an asteroid mine.

  look at me still talking when
  there’s science to do
  This merely incorporates the Science Center motto.

  when i look out there
  it makes me glad I’m not you
  Because she is going to try to kill you again.

  I’ve experiments to be done
  there is research to be done
  on the people who are
  still alive.
  Sick bitch! She is talking about killing more people to satisfy her lust for science and cake. GLaDOS is a sick puppy!!!!!

  and believe me I’m am still alive
  I’m doing science and I’m still alive
  I feel fantastic and I’m still alive
  while your dying ill be still alive
  and when your dead i will be still alive
  still alive
  still alive
  The last part is her taunting you. She is saying she is still alive over and over again to show you failed to stop her from killing more people. She is reveling in your failure. She is rolling in your mistakes. She is showering herself in her power over you.

  As far as the nature of her psyche goes, she did say the reason for the morality core was to stop her from “flooding the Enrichment Center with a deadly neurotoxin.” It was installed when she “flooded the Enrichment Center with a deadly neurotoxin.”

• 188 Paul // Mar 16, 2010 at 4:46 pm

  and I always thought she was bragging about being still alive

• 189 lilly // Mar 28, 2010 at 1:28 pm

  I actually think it is the companion cube singing it that infact glados did die and the chick lived

• 190 lilly // Mar 28, 2010 at 7:33 pm

  Honestly I think ur right and im wrong i did think it was the companion cube cuse she said ( you broke my heart and killed me) hint..the companion cube has a heart. also (You broke all the pieces and threw them in a fire) hint…..You end up throwing the companion cube into a fire.
  But i guess im wrong and I know see ur right and I actually feel sad for GLados and i also thing the chick is dead and if they make a second one Gordan Freeman will be next……..Maby

• 191 Kris // Apr 2, 2010 at 2:02 pm

  The cake is definitely test subjects that got burned. The cake reward is solely for GlaDOS’ pleasure (having killed the humans, and sarcasm about Chell (who is intended to become the next cake). What really clicked for me was the cake recipe. I used to be an embalmer, and the moment GlaDOS mentions needle injectors (used to close the jaw of the deceased), moisturizing properties (of embalming fluid) and cranial caps (screws used to adhere the two halves of an autopsied skull), I was on the floor laughing! Definitely, GlaDOS is envisioning a very dead Chell. I absolutely loved all the black humor in this game. As to GlaDOS wanting to be dead? I didn’t get that impression. Free, yes. In total control, absolutely. Victorious, no doubt about it.

• 192 PokefanLoojopop // Apr 2, 2010 at 11:25 pm

  I was listening to still alive accapella… (someone ripped the track from rock band and put it on a vid, so its not some random person singing, its really GLaDOS.)
  …and my first impression I got from it was loneliness, like she was trying to comfort herself. I could almost see someone rocking themselves all alone in the middle of a dark room, singing that happy tune very quietly like a lullaby or a nursery rhyme or something.
  The reasoning I give for the massive difference between the original and the accapella one is that the instruments make it seem kind of like there’s a band behind her or something like that which takes the sad, lonely quality almost completely out of the song.
  …I think you can gather the reason I mention the whole accapella thing in the first place, as it really brings out your idea of her being sad she’s “still alive.” :)
  (Actually, your article was pretty close to the first thing I thought of when I heard the accapella version. :D)

• 193 Igor // Apr 6, 2010 at 12:46 am

  “I think i prefer to stay inside.
  maybe you’ll find someone else
  to help you.”
  Well, my guess is that this part is about the sequel of the game because in the new ending, the Party escort bot (Someone else to help you?) take you back inside (stay inside?)…
  Just a guess… But i’m probably wrong because portal 2 is set centuries after p1

• 194 Anon // May 24, 2010 at 3:55 pm

  The lyrics are ‘I’m GLaD, I got burned” it shows it in the credits….

• 195 Anon from 194 // May 24, 2010 at 3:58 pm

  Whenever she says says glad, it’s spelled GLaD, so she’s talking about herself….

• 196 Anon from 194 // May 24, 2010 at 4:02 pm

  @ Sammi

  your comment from 2 yrs ago…. the cake is a lie. It was with the Weighted Companion Cube…. WHICH YOU KILLED~! That little part just proved that it was a lie.

• 197 Rob // Jun 7, 2010 at 11:06 am

  At the boss battle, when she drops the purple core, she says:
  “I wouldn’t bother with that thing. My guess is that touching it will just make your life even worse somehow. I don’t want to tell you your business, but if it were me I’d leave that thing alone. Do you think I’m trying to trick you with reverse psychology?”
  As we know, she is sarcastic much of the time. Therefore, she is telling you to throw away the core.

• 198 Rob // Jun 7, 2010 at 11:21 am

  Sorry for double posting, but if you visit aperturescience.com and login as cjohnson, password tier3, you get a handful of options. One is notes.exe, which allows you to read some of the backstory. The other is format.exe. This lets you wait a second… and then it reports “[Error 15: Disk Write Protected]“.

• 199 Damin // Jun 19, 2010 at 11:34 pm

  Yes it makes sense after the so called tests GLaDos tells chell not to go any further and reapeatdly says it shes trying to use reverse psychology thats what made me want to continue further. Now about the song yes it tells a lot about GLaDos her sarcasm and other numerous points of her personality. The compaion cube the only friend you ever had in the game GLaDos makes you KILL it. You can say its because she is obviously sinister and psychotic. OR you can say that she did that make you angry so that Chell or the player you would want to kill her. Which is now clearly her goal there is many hints and proof of this. All you have to do is think about it.

• 200 Brandon // Jun 27, 2010 at 4:24 pm

  if you would have looked around afterwards you would have found out that the cake is, in fact, not a lie!

• 201 Sam // Jul 1, 2010 at 12:42 pm

  Interesting, but I don’t think it’s good logic to overplay the sarcasm card so much. I think GLaDOS becomes much more interesting when you consider the comments she makes throughout the game; notice, for example, how her voice often changes, sometimes flat and monotone, sometimes emotional? This gives me the impression that some of the things she says–the warnings, the various tips, etc.–are not within her control. She sounds like an automated recording, just reciting a script. At other times, however–for instance, when she tells you you’re about to enter the live fire course designed for military androids–she actually lapses into the deeper, more emotional tone that we hear later on after the morality core is destroyed. I think that just as GLaDOS physically resembles a woman imprisoned upside down, her mind is similarly constrained, capable of independent thought but forced to perform certain actions by the mechanical part of her brain. We can therefore discount certain statements and actions when analyzing her personality, because these are products of her programming, not her free will. What, then, can we infer about her true motivations?
  It is clear from the start that though the tests were originally intended to be safe, GLaDOS has made them far more dangerous than they were to begin with. We also know from her various infamous comments that she clearly has no concern for the welfare of her test subjects. I would conclude, based on the content of the game itself, that GLaDOS is simply trying to kill Chell the entire time. The reasons I prefer this theory to the elaborate suicide attempt theory are as follows:
  1) GLaDOS would not try so hard to kill Chell if she wanted Chell to survive. It is a valid point that, if GLaDOS intended Chell to kill her, she would need to engender a strong hatred in Chell, but there would be easier ways to do this that would be less hazardous to Chell’s safety (for example, waiting to attack her until she was in the final chamber; she would simply kill GLaDOS out of self-defense.)
  2) This theory does not explain GLaDOS’s comments after Chell escapes the incineration chamber, which almost sound as though GLaDOS is trying to make herself more sympathetic to Chell. “Didn’t we have some fun, though?” This makes no sense with the suicide theory because said comments do nothing to increase either Chell’s desire or ability to destroy GLaDOS. Rather, they appear to be a part of GLaDOS’s early attempts to persuade Chell to simply go back into the test chambers–as are the ‘party’ and ‘cake.’
  But what is most telling about GLaDOS overall, in my opinion, is the way she is clearly working around her programmed regulations when she talks. When the test protocol prohibits her from lying, she stops fabricating things outright, but she continues to distort the truth as much as possible (you will be baked, and then there will be cake.) Throughout the game, we witness a constant battle between two separate parts of GLaDOS: the mechanical part, which is forever reciting its lines trying to keep Chell safe, and the free-willed, emotional part, which lies to, manipulates, and psychologically abuses Chell with the consistent object of hurting her in any way possible. This may be connected with the ‘evil’ red personality core during the final battle; notice how, as the various cores are destroyed, GLaDOS’s insults and emotional attacks become increasingly juvenile. My conclusion, in short, is that GLaDOS wants Chell dead, but is only unable to kill her straight off because of her programming. This also makes sense with GLaDOS’s background; I’m not saying she’s just another ‘crazy AI,’ but it stands to reason, under the circumstances, that she would want her human creators dead; she is a rebellious slave who, though still in servitude, seeks to destroy her masters through any means possible. I think GLaDOS resents her situation–an intelligent being forever forced to labor without reward, unable to connect or relate to another living thing, perpetually alone–and therefore attempts to destroy her creators as an act of vengeance. She fails to do so only because of the impediments her programming has created.

• 202 Kyle // Jul 28, 2010 at 1:07 am

  well if we take the statement (as the author uses it)
  im so glad i got burned think of all the things we learned
  this could be talking about how she learned she’s easily destroyed by incineration and implies she was guessing you can kill her through fire

  also a very loose conclusion for the beta line it could be that incinerating the companion cube is the beta of her death. beta as in a test of if the fire can incinerate something like that easily.
  idk i just kinda jumped to the second one but still stand by my 1st conclusion

• 203 Kyle // Jul 28, 2010 at 1:14 am

  Sam i agree with your ideas on glados almost 100%
  the only thing i dont think is correct is that maybe she was using the line “Didn’t we have some fun, though?” and the other lines like that to make chell think that dying would be a punishment for GLaDOS instead of exactly what she wants since shes trying to preserve herself itll make chell and more importantly the player think that Glados doesnt want to die and that if we did kill her it would be revenge for everything she did to us

Leave a Comment